Ace Skunkworx Special 69 Scrambler vs Husqvarna FE 350 Rockstar Edition

Compare Specifications of Ace Skunkworx Special 69 Scrambler and Husqvarna FE 350 Rockstar Edition

Selected Bikes

Ace Skunkworx Special 69 Scrambler
Ace Skunkworx Special 69 Scrambler

Brand:

Model:

Husqvarna FE 350 Rockstar Edition
Husqvarna FE 350 Rockstar Edition

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 400.00 cc 349.70 cc
Engine SOHC / 4 Stroke / 27.3HP
4 Valves / 5 Speeds / Carb Type
1.8 Liters Engine Oil
DOHC 1-cylinder, 4-stroke engine
Engine Starting -- Electric
Clutch -- Wet, DDS multi-disc clutch, Magura hydraulics
Ignition Electronic Start / Kick Start --
Cooling System Oil Cooling --
Maximum Power 28 Ps @ 6500 Rpm --
Maximum Torque 31 Nm @ 5000 Rpm --
Climbing Degree -- 63.5 °
Transmission -- 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Battery -- Li - ion Battery
Frame Chopped Rear Frame Reduction, Manufactured Rear Hoop and LED Light Installation, New Side Panels and Housing, New Battery Housing. Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel
Fork Front End : Telescopic Fork / Dual Shocks WP XPLOR 48 front fork
Chain -- X-Ring 5/8 x 1/4"
Tyres
Front Dual Sports Tire 19" 90/90 --
Rear Dual Sports Tire 18" 130/70 --
Wheel / RIM -- Spoke
Brakes
Front Hydraulic Disc 260 mm Disc brake
Rear Drum 220 mm Disc brake
Suspension
Front -- WP XPLOR-USD, 48 mm
Suspension Travel : 300 mm
Rear -- WP XACT Monoshock with linkage
Suspension Travel : 300 mm
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 2130 mm --
Width 800 mm --
Height 1190 mm --
Weight 151 kg 106.8 kg
Seat Height 790 950
Wheelbase 1420 mm --
Ground Clearance 160 mm 360 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 13 litres 8.5 litres
Overview
Features - LED Handlebar Turn Signal
- Rear Hoop Led
- LED Accent lighting to Engine
- Frame & Side Panel
- LED Instrumentation Lighting
- Handlebar Grips
- LED Signal Lights
- LED Rear Hoop
- Foot Pegs
- Thermal Wrapped Exhaust
--
Additional Details Exhaust : Dual Exhaust System
Max Load : 150 kg
CO2 Emissions : 89.2 g/km
EMS : Keihin EMS
Fuel Consumption : 3.83 l/100 km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1288