AGM Hanway Blackcafe 125 vs Triumph Scrambler 1200 Bond Edition

Compare Specifications of AGM Hanway Blackcafe 125 and Triumph Scrambler 1200 Bond Edition

Selected Bikes

AGM Hanway Blackcafe 125
AGM Hanway Blackcafe 125

Brand:

Model:

Triumph Scrambler 1200 Bond Edition
Triumph Scrambler 1200 Bond Edition

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine -- Liquid-cooled, 8 valve, SOHC, 270° crank angle parallel-twin
Clutch -- Wet, multi-plate assist clutch
Fuel System Fuel Injection Multipoint sequential electronic fuel injection
Cooling System Air Cooled Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power -- 89 Hp @7400 rpm
Maximum Torque -- 110 Nm @ 3950 rpm
Transmission 5 gears 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Top Speed 90 kmph --
Frame -- Tubular steel with aluminium cradle
Handle Bar 775 mm Handlebar width --
Tyres
Front 110 / 70-17 90/90-21
Rear 130 / 70-17 150/70 R17
Wheel / RIM -- Front Wheel : Tubeless 36-spoke 21 x 2.15 in, aluminium rims
Rear Wheel : Tubeless 32-spoke 17 x 4.25 in, aluminium rims
Brakes
Front Disc Brake Twin 320 mm discs, Brembo M50 monoblock calipers, radial master cylinder. Switchable Optimized Cornering ABS
Rear Disc Brake Single 255 mm disc, Brembo 2-piston floating caliper. Switchable Optimized Cornering ABS
Suspension
Front Dual upside-down shock absorbers Showa 47 mm fully adjustable USD forks. 250 mm wheel travel
Rear Double shock absorbers Öhlins fully adjustable piggy-back RSUs with twin springs. 250 mm wheel travel
Colors Available
Colors Black
Britain Green
Bordeaux
--


Physical Specs
Length 2000 mm --
Width 775 mm --
Height 1040 mm 1250 mm
Kerb Weight 118 207
Handlebar Width -- 905
Seat Height -- 870
Wheelbase 1320 mm 1570 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 15 litres 16 litres
Overview
Features - Tough Black Cafe
- Classic motorcycle
- Luxury finish
--
Additional Details -- Exhaust : Brushed 2 into 2 exhaust system with brushed high level silencers
Final Drive : X ring chain
Swingarm : Twin-sided, aluminium
Rake : 26.9 º
Trail : 5.09 in (129.2 mm)
Fuel Consumption : 4.9 l/100 km (58 MPG)
CO2 Figures : 113.0 g/km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4392