AGM Hanway Muscle50 vs Triumph Scrambler 1200 Bond Edition

Compare Specifications of AGM Hanway Muscle50 and Triumph Scrambler 1200 Bond Edition

Selected Bikes

AGM Hanway Muscle50
AGM Hanway Muscle50

Brand:

Model:

Triumph Scrambler 1200 Bond Edition
Triumph Scrambler 1200 Bond Edition

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine -- Liquid-cooled, 8 valve, SOHC, 270° crank angle parallel-twin
Clutch -- Wet, multi-plate assist clutch
Fuel System Electronically controlled carburettor Multipoint sequential electronic fuel injection
Cooling System Air cooled Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 3.08 HP @ 7500 RPM 89 Hp @7400 rpm
Maximum Torque -- 110 Nm @ 3950 rpm
Transmission 4 gears 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Top Speed 45 kmph --
Frame -- Tubular steel with aluminium cradle
Handle Bar 775 mm Handlebar width --
Tyres
Front 110 / 70-17 90/90-21
Rear 130 / 70-17 150/70 R17
Wheel / RIM Spoke Front Wheel : Tubeless 36-spoke 21 x 2.15 in, aluminium rims
Rear Wheel : Tubeless 32-spoke 17 x 4.25 in, aluminium rims
Brakes
Front Disc Brake Twin 320 mm discs, Brembo M50 monoblock calipers, radial master cylinder. Switchable Optimized Cornering ABS
Rear Drum Brake Single 255 mm disc, Brembo 2-piston floating caliper. Switchable Optimized Cornering ABS
Suspension
Front Dual upside-down shock absorbers Showa 47 mm fully adjustable USD forks. 250 mm wheel travel
Rear Double shock absorbers Öhlins fully adjustable piggy-back RSUs with twin springs. 250 mm wheel travel
Colors Available
Colors Black
Silver
--


Physical Specs
Length 2000 mm --
Width 775 mm --
Height 1040 mm 1250 mm
Kerb Weight 110 207
Handlebar Width -- 905
Seat Height -- 870
Wheelbase 1320 mm 1570 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 16 litres 16 litres
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details -- Exhaust : Brushed 2 into 2 exhaust system with brushed high level silencers
Final Drive : X ring chain
Swingarm : Twin-sided, aluminium
Rake : 26.9 º
Trail : 5.09 in (129.2 mm)
Fuel Consumption : 4.9 l/100 km (58 MPG)
CO2 Figures : 113.0 g/km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7016