AGM Retro vs Honda Giorno

Compare Specifications of AGM Retro and Honda Giorno

Selected Bikes

AGM Retro
AGM Retro

Brand:

Model:

Honda Giorno
Honda Giorno

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement -- 49.00 cc
Engine -- AF74E / water-cooled 4-stroke OHC single cylinder
Engine Starting -- Electric and Kick
Fuel System Electronically controlled carburettor Electronic type
Ignition -- Full transistor battery ignition
Cooling System Air Cooled Water-cooled
Maximum Power 2.8 HP @ 7500 RPM 4.5 PS @ 8000 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 4.1 NM @ 6000 RPM
Transmission Continuously variable transmission Continuously variable transmission (V-matic)
Top Speed 45 kmph --
Display -- Clock display
Handle Bar 880 mm Handlebar width --
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 3.50-10 80 / 100-10 46J
Rear 3.50-10 80 / 100-10 46J
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front Disc Brake --
Rear Drum Brake --
Suspension
Front Double telescopic shock absorbers --
Rear Mono shock absorber --
Colors Available
Colors Smokey
Black
Virgin beige
Pearl Deep Mud Gray
Matt Armored Green Metallic
Puco Blue


Physical Specs
Length 1890 mm 1650 mm
Width 880 mm 670 mm
Height 1090 mm 1035 mm
Weight -- 81 kg
Kerb Weight 91 --
Seat Height -- 720
Wheelbase 1285 mm 1180 mm
Ground Clearance -- 105 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity -- 4.5 litres
Overview
Features - Unique retro looks
- Beautiful chrome accents give the scooter extra class
- Comfort for two people
- Elegant chic individual style
- Fuel-efficient engine "eSP" with light driving
- Automatically stops the engine and contributes to fuel efficiency and the environment
- Well-balanced braking gives you plenty of room for driving
- Convenient storage of helmets and small items
- Charging your smartphone
- Large multi-reflector headlight & tail lamp
- Push-cancel type turn signal switch
- Seat opener switch that can be opened with one touch
- Maintenance-free battery that does not require refilling
- Center stand that can be hung with light force
Additional Details -- Fuel consumption rate * 2: 80.0 km / L
Minimum turning radius (m): 1.8 1.8

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9564