AJP PR3 Supermoto 125 vs Yamaha R125 Monster Energy Yamaha MotoGP Edition

Compare Specifications of AJP PR3 Supermoto 125 and Yamaha R125 Monster Energy Yamaha MotoGP Edition

Selected Bikes

AJP PR3 Supermoto 125
AJP PR3 Supermoto 125

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha R125 Monster Energy Yamaha MotoGP Edition
Yamaha R125 Monster Energy Yamaha MotoGP Edition

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 124.00 cc 124.70 cc
Engine Single cylinder, 4 stroke, 2 valves air cooled OHC liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, 4-valves
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Clutch Oil bath, multi-disc Wet, multiple-disc coil spring
Fuel System 30 mm Carburettor Electronic Fuel Injection
Ignition -- TCI (digital)
Cooling System -- liquid-cooled
Maximum Power -- 15.0 PS @ 9000 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 11.5 NM @ 8000 RPM
Transmission 5 speed Constant Mesh, 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Frame Composite – aluminium / steel Steel Deltabox
Headlamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 100/80-17-Inch 100/80-17 M/C
Rear 130/70-17-Inch 130/70-17 M/C
Wheel / RIM -- Alloy
Brakes
Front 260mm Disc,2 Piston caliper Hydraulic single disc, Ø292 mm
Rear 220 mm Disc Single Piston caliper Hydraulic single disc, Ø220 mm
Suspension
Front 240mm stroke fully adjustable Upside-down telescopic fork, Ø41 mm
Rear 280mm stroke Olle progressive system Swingarm, (Link type suspension)
Colors Available
Colors -- Monster Black


Physical Specs
Length -- 1990 mm
Width -- 755 mm
Height -- 1140 mm
Weight 104 kg 142 kg
Seat Height 840 825
Wheelbase 1360 mm 1325 mm
Ground Clearance 310 mm 155 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 7 litres 11.5 litres
Overview
Features -- - R-Series body with Monster Energy Yamaha MotoGP livery
- YZR-M1 MotoGP-inspired supersport cockpit
- 125cc engine with Variable Valve Actuation
- Aluminium swing arm for high speed stability
- Light and precise Assist & Slipper clutch
- Sophisticated high-visibility LCD instruments
- Powerful braking system
- Wide rear tyre for sharp road holding and style
Additional Details -- Final transmission : Chain
Fuel consumption : 2.13l/100km
CO2 emission : 49g/km
Caster angle : 25º
Trail : 89mm
Front travel : 130 mm
Rear travel : 114 mm
Oil tank capacity : 1.15litres

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2717