AJP PR7 Adventure 650 vs Kawasaki VERSYS 650 LT

Compare Specifications of AJP PR7 Adventure 650 and Kawasaki VERSYS 650 LT

Selected Bikes

AJP PR7 Adventure 650
AJP PR7 Adventure 650

Brand:

Model:

Kawasaki VERSYS 650 LT
Kawasaki VERSYS 650 LT

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 600.00 cc 649.00 cc
Engine Single cylinder, 4 stroke, 4 valves, liquid cooled, DOHC 4-stroke, 2-cylinder, DOHC, liquid-cooled, 4 valves per cylinder parallel twin
Engine Starting Electric --
Clutch Oil bath, multidisc --
Fuel System 45 mm Delphi fuel injection system DFI® with 38mm Keihin throttle bodies (2)
Ignition -- TCBI with digital advance
Cooling System Liquid cooled liquid-cooled
Transmission 6 speed 6-speed with positive neutral finder
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Frame Composite – aluminum / steel Double pipe diamond frame constructed from high-tensile steel
Tyres
Front 90/90-21-Inch 120/70 ZR17
Rear 140/80-18-Inch 160/60 ZR17
Wheel / RIM Spoke Alloy
Brakes
Front 300 mm Disc, 2 Piston caliper Dual 300mm petal-style discs with 2-piston calipers, ABS
Rear 240 mm Disc, Single Piston caliper Single 250mm petal-style disc with single-piston caliper, ABS
Suspension
Front 300 mm stroke fully adjustable 41mm hydraulic telescopic fork with stepless adjustable rebound and preload/5.9 in
Rear 300 mm stroke fully adjustable Single offset laydown shock with remote adjustable spring preload/5.7 in
Colors Available
Colors -- Pearl Blizzard White/Metallic Carbon Gray


Physical Specs
Length -- 2164 mm
Width -- 944 mm
Height -- 1399 mm
Weight 140 kg --
Kerb Weight 165 216
Seat Height 920 840
Wheelbase 1540 mm 1414 mm
Ground Clearance 320 mm 170 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 17 litres 20.8 litres
Overview
Features - USB port
- Cush drive rear hub
- Titanium header pipes well protected by the HD bash plate
- Hard saddlebags featuring KQR™ mounts
- Hand guards for increased wind protection
Additional Details -- Rake/Trail : 25/4.3 in

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2686