AJS Cadwell 125 vs Husqvarna 2023 TE 150

Compare Specifications of AJS Cadwell 125 and Husqvarna 2023 TE 150

Selected Bikes

AJS Cadwell 125
AJS Cadwell 125

Brand:

Model:

Husqvarna 2023 TE 150
Husqvarna 2023 TE 150

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 125.00 cc 143.99 cc
Engine 4-stroke, OHC, air cooled, single cylinder 1-cylinder, 2-stroke engine
Engine Starting Electric and kick Kick and electric starter
Clutch -- DS wet multi-disc clutch, Braktec hydraulics
Fuel System Fuel type : Unleaded or E5 petrol --
Maximum Power 11 Ps @ 9000 rpm --
Maximum Torque 10 Nm @ 6500 rpm --
Seating Capacity -- 1
Transmission Five speed, chain drive 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain -- Chain X-Ring 5/8 x 1/4"
Top Speed 97 kmph --
Battery 12v 9Ah --
Frame -- Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel
Sprocket Front sprocket : 428 14T
Rear Sprocket : 428 45T
--
Tyres
Front 110/70-17 --
Rear 130/70-17 --
Wheel / RIM Front rim : 17 x MT2.5
Rear rim : 17 x MT3.50
Spoke
Brakes
Front 300 mm Single disc (Combined Braking System) Disc brake 260 mm
Rear 210 mm disc (Combined Braking System) Disc brake 220 mm
Suspension
Front -- WP XPLOR-USD, Ø 48 mm
Rear -- WP XACT Monoshock with linkage
Colors Available
Colors Black
Grey
--


Physical Specs
Length 2040 mm --
Width 720 mm --
Height 1060 mm --
Weight 113 kg 99.6 kg
Seat Height 740 950
Wheelbase 1330 mm --
Ground Clearance -- 360 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 11 litres 9 litres
Overview
Features - Odometer
- Speedometer
- Ultra lightweight punch
- Composite carbon fibre subframe
- Integrated cooling and radiators
- Hydraulic brakes
- Hydraulic clutch
- Bodywork
- CNC machined triple clamp
- Electric start and wiring harness
- Engine management system
Additional Details Bore x Stroke : 54 x 54 mm
Max laden mass : 274 kg
Max load : 150 kg
Generator nominal output : 100VA
Fuel consumption : (as recorded on the COC) 118 mpg
EMS: Continental EMS
Steering Head Angle: 63.5 °
Suspension Travel (Front): 300 Mm
Suspension Travel (Rear): 300 Mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5898