AJS Cadwell Clubman vs Husqvarna 2022 Svartpilen 125

Compare Specifications of AJS Cadwell Clubman and Husqvarna 2022 Svartpilen 125

Selected Bikes

AJS Cadwell Clubman
AJS Cadwell Clubman

Brand:

Model:

Husqvarna 2022 Svartpilen 125
Husqvarna 2022 Svartpilen 125

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 124.00 cc 125.00 cc
Engine 4-stroke, OHC, air cooled, single cylinder 1-cylinder, 4-stroke engine
Engine Starting Electric and kick Electric starter
Engine Lubrication -- Forced oil lubrication with 2 oil pumps
Fuel System Electronic Fuel Injection
Fuel type : Unleaded or E5 petrol
--
Cooling System -- Liquid cooled
Maximum Power 11 Ps @ 9000 rpm 14.7 PS
Maximum Torque 95 Nm @ 6500 rpm --
Seating Capacity -- 2
Transmission Five speed, chain drive 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain -- Chain X-Ring 5/8 x 1/4"
Top Speed 97 kmph --
Display -- Digital
Frame -- Steel trellis frame, powder coated
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Wheel / RIM Front : 110/70-17
Rear : 130/70-17
Spoke
Brakes
Front 300 mm single disc (Combined Braking System) ByBre, opposed four-piston caliper, brake disc 320 mm
Rear 210 mm disc (Combined Braking System) ByBre, single-piston, floating caliper, brake disc 230 mm
ABS -- two channel Bosch 10.1MB
Suspension
Front -- WP APEX 43
Rear -- WP APEX - Monoshock
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 2040 mm --
Width 720 mm --
Height 1060 mm --
Weight 113 kg 146 kg
Seat Height 740 835
Wheelbase 1330 mm --
Ground Clearance -- 145 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 11.2 litres 10 litres
Overview
Features - Odometer
- Speedometer : Dual marked
- Wheels and tyres
- Controlzone and triple clamp
- LED Lights
- Low Profile seat
- Tank and filler cap
Additional Details Bore x Stroke : 54 mm x 54 mm
Fuel consumption : (as recorded on the COC) 118 mpg
Generator output : 100VA
Max laden mass : 274 kg
Max load : 150 kg
Co2 Emissions: 50 G/Km
Ems: Bosch Ems
Steering Head Angle: 65 °
Suspension Travel (Front): 142 Mm
Suspension Travel (Rear): 142 Mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5683