AJS Highway Star 125 vs Malaguti Drakon125

Compare Specifications of AJS Highway Star 125 and Malaguti Drakon125

Selected Bikes

AJS Highway Star 125
AJS Highway Star 125

Brand:

Model:

Malaguti Drakon125
Malaguti Drakon125

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 125.00 cc 124.80 cc
Engine 4-stroke, OHC, oil cooled, twin cylinder 1 cylinder, 4-stroke, water cooled
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Fuel System Electronic Fuel Injection - Delphi MT05
Fuel type : Unleaded or E5 petrol
--
Ignition -- ECU
Maximum Power 12 Ps @ 9014 rpm 13.4 PS @ 9500 RPM
Maximum Torque 94 Nm @ 9000 rpm 11.4 Nm @ 7500 RPM
Load Carrying Capacity -- 320 kg
Seating Capacity -- 2
Transmission Five speed, chain drive 6-speed manual transmission
Top Speed 97 kmph 99 kmph
Display -- Colour TFT display
Sprocket Front sprocket : 14T 520
Rear sprocket : 38T 520
--
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Fuel Economy
Overall Mileage -- 38 kmpl
Tyres
Front 120/80-17 100/80-17
Rear 140/70-17 130/70-17
Wheel / RIM Rim size : Front : 3.00 x 17 - Rear : 4.10 x 17 Front Rim: 2,75x17
Rear Rim: 3,50x17
Brakes
Front Twin disc Combined Braking System
300 mm 4 mm thick - 3 mm minimum
300mm Hydraulic disc brake with ABS, disc
Rear Single disc Combined Braking System
240 mm 4 mm thick - 3 mm minumum
218mm hydraulic disc brake with ABS, disc
Suspension
Front -- Upside-down shock absorber
Rear -- Single shock absorber
Colors Available
Colors Black
Red
White
Blue
--


Physical Specs
Length 2135 mm 2050 mm
Width 810 mm 810 mm
Height 1160 mm 1100 mm
Weight 164 kg --
Seat Height 710 --
Wheelbase 1460 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 19 litres 10.5 litres
Overview
Features -- - Smart electronic fuel injection
- MAXXIS tyres
- Upside-down fork
- LED turn signals
- USB socket with dual output
- High-resolution color TFT display
Malaguti Drakon125
High-resolution color TFT display
Additional Details Max laden mass : 304 kg
Turning angle : left/right 43 deg.
Fuel consumption : (as recorded on the COC) 94 mpg
C02 Emission: 59 g/km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

729