AJS Insetto 125 vs Honda SH125i with Topbox 2022

Compare Specifications of AJS Insetto 125 and Honda SH125i with Topbox 2022

Selected Bikes

AJS Insetto 125
AJS Insetto 125

Brand:

Model:

Honda SH125i with Topbox 2022
Honda SH125i with Topbox 2022

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 125.00 cc 124.50 cc
Engine 3J4, 4-stroke, forced air-cooled Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke SOHC
Engine Starting Electric and kick Electric
Clutch -- Automatic; centrifugal
Fuel System Delphi electronic fuel injection
Fuel type - Unleaded or E5 petrol
PGM-FI electronic fuel injection
Cooling System -- Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 9 Ps @ 7500 Rpm 12.3 PS @ 8250 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 11.4 NM @ 6500 RPM
Seating Capacity -- 2
Transmission CVT twist & go CVT
Drivetrain -- V-Belt
Top Speed 38 kmph --
Battery -- YTZ8V 7Ah MF
Display -- LCD presents all warning lights – including Smart Key, HSTC/ABS and Idling Stop operation – neatly around a central digital speedo/odometer display.
Frame -- Tubular Steel Underbone
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Fuel Economy
Overall Mileage -- 45 kmpl
Tyres
Front 120/70-12 100/80-16 inch
Rear 130/70-12 120/80-16 inch
Wheel / RIM -- Spoke
Brakes
Front Disc Combined Braking System 240mm disc, 2 piston caliper
Rear Disc Combined Braking System 240mm disc, single piston caliper
ABS -- 2 Channel
Suspension
Front -- Telescopic Φ33
Rear -- Dual-damper unit swing arm
Colors Available
Colors -- Timeless Grey Metallic
Pearl Splendor Red
Matt Pearl Cool White
Matte Rock Grey


Physical Specs
Length 1910 mm 2085 mm
Width 670 mm 740 mm
Height -- 1129 mm
Weight 115 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 136
Seat Height 789 799
Wheelbase 1400 mm 1353 mm
Ground Clearance -- 142 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 7.2 litres 7 litres
Overview
Features -- - Lcd Screen
- Smart Key
- Anti-Lock Braking System
- Euro5
- Idling Stop Technology
- V-Matic Transmission
- Usb Type-C Charging Socket
- Honda Selectable Torque Control
- 16 Inch Wheels
Additional Details Max laden mass : 265 kg
Fuel consumption : (as recorded on the COC) 101 mpg
Caster Angle: 26
Trail: 85 mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

715