AJS Isaba vs Keeway Superlight 125 Standard E4

Compare Specifications of AJS Isaba and Keeway Superlight 125 Standard E4

Selected Bikes

AJS Isaba
AJS Isaba

Brand:

Model:

Keeway Superlight 125 Standard E4
Keeway Superlight 125 Standard E4

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 125.00 cc 124.00 cc
Engine 4-stroke, OHC, air cooled, single cylinder 1-cylinder/4-stroke/2-valve, Air-cooled, OHV
Engine Starting Electric Electric & Kick
Engine Lubrication -- Pressure splash lubrication
Clutch -- Wet multi-plate
Fuel System Electronic Fuel Injection - Rongmao YB05
Fuel type : Unleaded or E5 petrol
EFI
Ignition -- C.D.I
Cooling System -- Air-cooled
Maximum Power 11 Ps @ 9500 rpm 10.46 PS @ 9000 RPM
Maximum Torque 9 Nm @ 8000 rpm 8.9 NM @ 7500 RPM
Seating Capacity -- 2
Transmission Five speed, chain drive 5-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5
Drivetrain -- Chain
Top Speed 97 kmph --
Display -- Analog
Frame -- Bassinet type
Sprocket Front sprocket : 14T 428
Rear sprocket : 48T 428
--
Headlamp -- Bulb
Taillamp -- Bulb
Tyres
Front 100/80-17 110/90-16
Rear 120/70-17 130/90-15
Wheel / RIM Rim size : Front : 2.50 x 17 - Rear : 3.50 x 17 Alloy
Brakes
Front Single disc Combined Braking System
280 mm 4 mm thick - 3 mm minimum
Disc
Rear Single disc Combined Braking System
240 mm 4 mm thick - 3 mm minimum
Drum
Suspension
Front -- Telescopic forks
110 mm
Rear -- Telescopic coil spring oil damped
80 mm
Colors Available
Colors Royal Blue
Black
Grey
--


Physical Specs
Length 1985 mm 2260 mm
Width 745 mm 800 mm
Height 1075 mm 1110 mm
Weight 136 kg 134 kg
Seat Height 760 730
Wheelbase 1360 mm 1440 mm
Ground Clearance -- 120 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 13 litres 15 litres
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Max laden mass : 276 kg
Max load : 140 kg
Gear ratios :
Gear 1 - 35.394
Gear 2 - 21.910
Gear 3 - 16.140
Gear 4 - 12.920
Gear 5 - 10.771
Maximum hill starting ability fully laden : 15%
Turning angle : left/right 40 deg
Fuel consumption : (as recorded on the COC) 104 mpg
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7618