Babboe Mini vs Kettler Grinder SL Pure 27.5

Compare Specifications of Babboe Mini and Kettler Grinder SL Pure 27.5

Selected Bikes

Babboe Mini
Babboe Mini

Brand:

Model:

Kettler Grinder SL Pure 27.5
Kettler Grinder SL Pure 27.5

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Load Carrying Capacity Luggage rack load (kg) : 20 Max Weight Allowed : 135Kg
Frame Extra sturdy frame with shockproof powder coating, treated on the inside to prevent rusting. Material : Alloy
Stem -- Leadtec LCS-7091
Handle Bar -- MTB-AL-174N ISO-C
Fork -- 27.5 inch Kettler fork
Seatpost Unsprung Kalloy SP-C297
Crankset -- Lasco RCK1130TCG16
Pedals -- Fasten NW-450
Shifters -- Shimano Altus SL-M315
Gear Shimano Nexus 7-speed --
Saddle -- Vader LWS(N5)-5
Derailleur Front -- 9 speed derailleur gears
Derailleur Rear -- 9 speed derailleur gears
Hub Front -- KT-Ayer
Hub Rear -- KT-A15F
Spoke Extra sturdy spokes Spoke 2.0
Headlamp Marwi --
Taillamp Spanninga --
Tyres
Front Schwalbe Big Apple, 20 inch 27,5 x 2.00, Vee Rubber Speedtser
Rear Schwalbe Big Apple, 26 inch 27,5 x 2.00, Vee Rubber Speedtser
Wheel / RIM Double walled front and rear rims 27,5 inch, Aluminium
Brakes
Front Rollerbrake V-Brake, Lee Chi TX-122
Rear Rollerbrake V-Brake, Lee Chi TX-122
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Wood Silver shiny


Physical Specs
Length 2350 mm --
Width 650 mm --
Height 1100 mm --
Weight 44 kg --
Wheelbase 1800 mm --
Overview
Features - Adjustable saddle
- Steering dampers
- Adjustable steering wheel
- Suitable for Maxi-Cosi
- 2 three-point seat belts
- Abus Lock brand
- ART lock certification
- Anti-puncture tires
--
Additional Details Way of parking : With the double standard
Sitting posture : Slightly bent seating position
Environment : Flat roads
Width box (cm) : 64
Height box (cm) : 50
Length box (cm) : 79
Box load capacity (kg) : 80
Box volume (L) : 250
Number of children : 1 child, 2 children
Saddle load (kg) : 100
Material box : European beech wood
Frame Size : 38Cm, 44Cm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3221