Bajaj Rouser NS 200 vs Kawasaki W175 Cafe

Compare Specifications of Bajaj Rouser NS 200 and Kawasaki W175 Cafe

Selected Bikes

Bajaj Rouser NS 200
Bajaj Rouser NS 200

Brand:

Model:

Kawasaki W175 Cafe
Kawasaki W175 Cafe

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 199.50 cc 177.00 cc
Engine 4-valve, DTSi 200 cc, Triple Spark Engine 4-stroke, SOHC, 1 cyl, water-cooled
Fuel System -- Carburettor Mikuni VM24
Ignition DC Ignition Carburettor Mikuni VM24
Cooling System Liquid Cooled Liquid cooled
Maximum Power 23.52 Ps @ 9500 RPM 13 PS @ 7500 RPM
Maximum Torque 18.3 Nm @ 8000 RPM 13.2 NM @ 6000 RPM
Transmission 6 Speed 5-speed, return
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5
Top Speed 136 kmph --
Headlamp Head Lamp (Low Beam) : Projector Lamp 55 W
Head Lamp (High Beam) : Ellipsoidal Lamp 55 W
--
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 100/80 - 17, 52 P, Tubeless 80 / 100-17M / C 46P
Rear 130/70 - 17, 61 P, Tubeless 100 / 90-17M / C 55P
Wheel / RIM Alloy Spoke
Brakes
Front 280 mm Petal Disc with Floating Caliper Single disc
Rear 230 mm Petal Disc with Floating Caliper Drum
Suspension
Front 37 mm Telescopic Front Fork with Antifriction Bush Telescopic fork
Rear Nitrox Mono Shock Absorber with Piggy Back Gas Canister Swingarm, dual shock absorbers with spring preload adjustability
Colors Available
Colors Classic Black
Blue On Black
Red On Black
White On Black
Yellow
Silver
Red


Physical Specs
Length 2017 mm 1940 mm
Width 804 mm 765 mm
Height 1195 mm 1045 mm
Weight -- 126 kg
Kerb Weight 145 --
Wheelbase 1363 mm 1275 mm
Ground Clearance 167 mm 165 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12 litres 13.5 litres
Overview
Features - Aggressive styling with muscular looks
- Twin Tone Decal
- Digital Analog Console
- Backlit switches
- Stylish Alloy wheels
- Low CG for stability
- Ergonomic design
- Nitrox mono shock
- Pressed Steel Perimeter frame
- Underbelly Exhaust
- Shorter sporty rear fender
- The rear suspension is gold
- Chrome-style exhaust guard
- Telescopic fork
Additional Details -- Primary Reduction Ratio : 3,667 (77/21)
Final Reduction Ratio : 2,333 (35/15)

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6636