Benelli TRK 251 SE vs Kawasaki Versys X 300 Urban

Compare Specifications of Benelli TRK 251 SE and Kawasaki Versys X 300 Urban

Selected Bikes

Benelli TRK 251 SE
Benelli TRK 251 SE

Brand:

Model:

Kawasaki Versys X 300 Urban
Kawasaki Versys X 300 Urban

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 249.00 cc 296.00 cc
Engine 1-Cylinder/ 4-stroke/ 4-valve, DOHC Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke Parallel Twin,DOHC, 8 valves
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication Pressure Splash Lubrication Forced lubrication, wet sump
Clutch Wet Multi-plate Wet multi-disc, manual
Fuel System EFI Fuel injection: Ø 32 mm x 2 with dual throttle valves
Ignition TLI --
Cooling System Liquid Cooled Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 24.5 HP @ 9250 RPM 40 PS @ 11500 RPM
Maximum Torque 21.1 NM @ 8000 RPM 25.7 NM @ 10000 RPM
Transmission 6 Speed 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Display LCD display --
Frame Arch Bar Truck --
Headlamp LED --
Tyres
Front 110/70 - R17 100/90-19M/C 57S
Rear 150/60 - R17 130/80-17M/C 65S
Wheel / RIM Front: 17 x 3.5 inch wheels
Rear: 17 x 4.5 inch wheels
Spoke
Brakes
Front Disc, 280mm Single 290 mm petal disc. Caliper: Single balanced actuation dual piston
Rear Disc, 240mm Single 220 mm petal disc. Caliper: Dual piston
Suspension
Front Telescopic Forks, 135mm 41 mm telescopic fork
Rear Telescopic Coil Spring Oil Damped, 60mm Bottom-Link Uni-Trak, gas-charged shock and adjustable preload
Colors Available
Colors -- Metallic Spark Black
Candy Lime Green


Physical Specs
Length 2100 mm 2170 mm
Width 840 mm 860 mm
Height -- 1390 mm
Weight 173 kg --
Kerb Weight 164 175
Seat Height 800 --
Wheelbase 1380 mm 1450 mm
Ground Clearance 170 mm 180 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 18 litres 17 litres
Overview
Features -- - Topcase System 30 Litres
Additional Details Exhaust System: Long Acting Catalyst Final drive : Sealed chain
Primary Reduction Ratio : 3.087 (71/23)
Gear Ratios 1st : 2.714 (38/14)
Gear Ratios 2nd : 1.789 (34/19)
Gear Ratios 3rd : 1.409 (31/22)
Gear Ratios 4th : 1.160 (29/25)
Gear Ratios 5th : 1.000 (27/27)
Gear Ratios 6th : 0.857 (24/28)
Final reduction ratio : 3.286 (46/14)
Fuel consumption : 4.1 l/100 km
CO2 emission : 103 g/km
Trail : 108 mm
Wheel travel front : 130 mm
Wheel travel rear : 148 mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9675