Beta 2019 RR 350 4T vs Kawasaki Ninja 400 Performance

Compare Specifications of Beta 2019 RR 350 4T and Kawasaki Ninja 400 Performance

Selected Bikes

Beta 2019 RR 350 4T
Beta 2019 RR 350 4T

Brand:

Model:

Kawasaki Ninja 400 Performance
Kawasaki Ninja 400 Performance

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 349.10 cc 399.00 cc
Engine Single cylinder, 4-stroke, liquid-cooled Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke Parallel Twin,DOHC, 8 valves
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication 2 oil pumps Forced lubrication, wet sump
Clutch wet multi-disc clutch Wet multi-disc, manual
Fuel System Synerject dual electronic injection Fuel injection: Ø 32 mm x 2
Cooling System Liquid Cooled Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power -- 45 PS @ 10000 RPM
Maximum Torque -- 38 NM @ 8000 RPM
Transmission 6 gears 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Frame Molybdenum steel with double cradle split above the exhaust port Trellis, high-tensile steel
Tyres
Front 90/90 - 21 110/70R17 M/C 54H
Rear 140/80 -18 150/60R17 M/C 66H
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front Wave disc 260 mm and double-piston floating caliper Single semi-floating 310 mm petal discs. Caliper: Single balanced actuation dual piston
Rear Wave disc 240 mm and single-piston floating caliper Single 220 mm petal disc. Caliper: Dual-piston
Suspension
Front Hydraulic USD fork with 48 mm shaft 41mm telescopic fork
Rear Monoshock with progressive compound lever Bottom-Link Uni-Trak, gas-charged shock with adjustable preload
Colors Available
Colors -- Lime green / Ebony (KRT Edition)
Metallic Spark Black / Lime Green


Physical Specs
Length 2180 mm 1990 mm
Width 807 mm 710 mm
Height 1270 mm 1120 mm
Weight 109 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 168
Seat Height -- 785
Wheelbase 1490 mm 1370 mm
Ground Clearance 320 mm 140 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 8 litres 14 litres
Overview
Features -- - Akrapovic Sports Exhaust
Additional Details -- Final drive : Sealed chain
Primary Reduction Ratio : 2.219 (71/32)
Gear Ratios 1st : 2.929 (41/14)
Gear Ratios 2nd : 2.056 (37/18)
Gear Ratios 3rd : 1.619 (34/21)
Gear Ratios 4th : 1.333 (32/24)
Gear Ratios 5th : 1.154 (30/26)
Gear Ratios 6th : 1.037 (28/27)
Final reduction ratio : 2.929 (41/14)
CO2 emission : 100 g/km
Trail : 92 mm
Wheel travel front : 120 mm
Wheel travel rear : 130 mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7225