Beta 2019 RR 430 4T vs Husqvarna 2023 FS 450

Compare Specifications of Beta 2019 RR 430 4T and Husqvarna 2023 FS 450

Selected Bikes

Beta 2019 RR 430 4T
Beta 2019 RR 430 4T

Brand:

Model:

Husqvarna 2023 FS 450
Husqvarna 2023 FS 450

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 430.90 cc 449.90 cc
Engine Single cylinder, 4-stroke, liquid-cooled 1-cylinder, 4-stroke engine
Engine Starting Electric Electric starter
Engine Lubrication 2 oil pumps --
Clutch wet multi-disc clutch Wet multi-disc Suter clutch, Brembo hydraulics
Fuel System Synerject dual electronic injection --
Cooling System Liquid Cooled --
Seating Capacity -- 1
Transmission 6 gears 5-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5
Drivetrain -- Chain 5/8 x 1/4"
Frame Molybdenum steel with double cradle split above the exhaust port 25CrMo4 steel central-tube frame
Tyres
Front 90/90 - 21 --
Rear 140/80 -18 --
Wheel / RIM Alloy Spoke
Brakes
Front Wave disc 260 mm and double-piston floating caliper Disc brake 310 mm
Rear wave disc 240 mm and single-piston floating caliper Disc brake 220 mm
Suspension
Front Hydraulic USD fork with 48 mm shaft WP XACT-USD, Ø 48 mm
Rear Monoshock with progressive compound lever WP XACT Monoshock with linkage
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 2180 mm --
Width 807 mm --
Height 1270 mm --
Weight 110 kg 107.6 kg
Seat Height -- 898
Wheelbase 1490 mm --
Ground Clearance 320 mm 281 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 8 litres 7 litres
Overview
Features - New throttle control
- Clutch actuator with wider diameter
- Powerful engine
- Anti hopping clutch
- Lightweight frame
- Polyamide-reinforced aluminium subframe
- CNC machined triple clamps
- Functional bodywork
- Hydraulic clutch
- Hydraulic brakes
- ProTaper handlebar
- ODI grips
- Map select switch
- Quickshift
- Traction Control
- Launch Control
- Mapping
- EMS (Engine Management System)
- Hour meter
- Start/stop switch
- Electric start
Additional Details -- EMS: Keihin EMS
Steering Head Angle: 63.9 °
Suspension Travel (Front): 285 Mm
Suspension Travel (Rear): 266 Mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5311