Bristol Classic 250 vs Yamaha 2022 XT250

Compare Specifications of Bristol Classic 250 and Yamaha 2022 XT250

Selected Bikes

Bristol Classic 250
Bristol Classic 250

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2022 XT250
Yamaha 2022 XT250

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 249.00 cc 249.00 cc
Engine GS250 Single cylinder , 4 strokes , SOHC , Euro 3 Air-cooled SOHC 4-stroke single; 2 valves
Engine Starting Electric Starter Electric Start
Fuel System -- Yamaha Fuel Injection (YFI)
Ignition Carburetor TCI: Transistor Controlled Ignition
Cooling System Air Cooling --
Maximum Power 18 Ps @ 7500 rpm --
Maximum Torque 18 Nm @ 5600 Rpm --
Transmission 5 Speed 5-speed; multiplate wet clutch
Drivetrain -- Final Drive: Chain
Top Speed 125 kmph --
Tyres
Front 110/70 x 17" 2.75-21
Rear 130/70 x 17" 120/80-18
Wheel / RIM Front wheel : 2.5 " x 17 alloy
Rear Wheel : 3.5" x 17 alloy
--
Brakes
Front Single disc Single disc, 245mm
Rear Single disc Single disc, 203mm
Suspension
Front Inverted shock absorber suspension 35mm telescopic fork; 8.9-in travel
Rear Oil damping shock suspension Single shock, adjustable preload; 7.1-in travel
Colors Available
Colors Red
Grey
Black
White
--


Physical Specs
Length 2100 mm 2148 mm
Width 720 mm 805 mm
Height 1090 mm 1160 mm
Seat Height -- 830
Wheelbase 1390 mm 1358 mm
Ground Clearance -- 284 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 14 litres 9 litres
Overview
Features - Bristol Speedometer
- Digital
Advanced LCD Instruments
Extended Fuel Range
Comfortable Saddle
Protective Fenders
Passenger-Ready
Bright Illumination
Dual Sport Lighting
Fork Protection
Forest-Friendly Exhaust
Modern Battery
Nimble Steering
Dirt-Ready Wheels
Low Maintenance Engine
Additional Details Bore & Stroke : 72 x 61.2
Exhaust : Single stainless with catalitic
Euro 3 Compliant
Engine oil : 1.3 L
Lightning : Halogen bulb system , High and low beam , rear LED lamps and signal lights
Fuel gauge : Digital fuel gauge
Rake (Caster Angle): 26.4°
Trail: 4.2 in
Fuel Economy: 76 mpg
Wet Weight: 291 lb

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5302