Brixton Cromwell 250 vs Brixton Felsberg 250

Compare Specifications of Brixton Cromwell 250 and Brixton Felsberg 250

Selected Bikes

Brixton Cromwell 250
Brixton Cromwell 250

Brand:

Model:

Brixton Felsberg 250
Brixton Felsberg 250

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 249.00 cc 249.00 cc
Engine Single cylinder four stroke engine, 4 valves, air-cooled Single cylinder four stroke engine, 4 valves, air-cooled
Engine Starting Electric --
Ignition ECU ECU
Cooling System Air Cooled Air Cooled
Maximum Power 16.8 PS @ 7500 RPM 16.8 PS @ 7500 RPM
Maximum Torque 16.5 NM @ 6500 RPM 16.5 NM @ 6500 RPM
Load Carrying Capacity 315 kg 325 kg
Seating Capacity 2 2
Transmission 5-speed manual 5-speed manual
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 1-N-2-3-4-5
Top Speed 114 kmph 114 kmph
Display Digital --
Headlamp LED LED
Taillamp LED LED
Tyres
Front 100/90-18 100/90-18
Rear 120/80-17 120/80-17
Wheel / RIM Front Rim : 2.50 x 18
Rear Rim : 3.00 x 17
Front Rim: 2.50 x 18
Rear Rim: 3.00 x 17
Brakes
Front Hydraulic disc brake with ABS, one brake disc 276 mm Hydraulic disc brake with ABS, one brake disc 276 mm
Rear Hydraulic disc brake with ABS, one brake disc 220 mm Hydraulic disc brake with ABS, one brake disc 220 mm
Suspension
Front Teleskopic fork Teleskopic fork upside-down
Rear Swingarm with 2 shock absorbers Swingarm with 2 shock absorbers
Colors Available
Colors Titanium Black / Sterling Grey
Desert Gold / Clockwork Orange
Backstage Black
Timberwolf Grey
Backstage Black (2022)
Cargo Green (2022)


Physical Specs
Length 2020 mm 2050 mm
Width 850 mm 850 mm
Height 1105 mm 1120 mm
Weight 145 kg 155 kg
Seat Height 790 --
Fuel Tank Capacity 11.5 litres 14.5 litres
Overview
Features -- - KOSO LED indicators
- LED beams front and rear plus
- ABS Brakes And Adjustable Rear Shock Absorbers As Standard
Additional Details Fuel type: Unleaded fuel only, RON/ROZ min. 95
Fuel Consumption :3.1 L/100 km
CO2 Emissions : 71 g/km
Fuel type: Unleaded fuel only, RON/ROZ min. 95
Fuel Consumption :3.2 L/100 km
CO2 Emissions : 73 g/km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9191