Brixton Cromwell 250 vs Yamaha 2022 TT-R230

Compare Specifications of Brixton Cromwell 250 and Yamaha 2022 TT-R230

Selected Bikes

Brixton Cromwell 250
Brixton Cromwell 250

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2022 TT-R230
Yamaha 2022 TT-R230

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 249.00 cc 223.00 cc
Engine Single cylinder four stroke engine, 4 valves, air-cooled Air-cooled SOHC 4-stroke; 2 valves
Engine Starting Electric Electric Start
Fuel System -- Carburetor
Ignition ECU CDI
Cooling System Air Cooled --
Maximum Power 16.8 PS @ 7500 RPM --
Maximum Torque 16.5 NM @ 6500 RPM --
Load Carrying Capacity 315 kg --
Seating Capacity 2 --
Transmission 5-speed manual Constant-mesh 6-speed; multiplate wet clutch
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 --
Drivetrain -- Final Drive: Chain
Top Speed 114 kmph --
Display Digital --
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 100/90-18 80/100-21
Rear 120/80-17 100/100-18
Wheel / RIM Front Rim : 2.50 x 18
Rear Rim : 3.00 x 17
--
Brakes
Front Hydraulic disc brake with ABS, one brake disc 276 mm Hydraulic single disc, 220mm
Rear Hydraulic disc brake with ABS, one brake disc 220 mm Drum, 130mm
Suspension
Front Teleskopic fork Telescopic fork; 9.4-in travel
Rear Swingarm with 2 shock absorbers Single shock; 8.7-in travel
Colors Available
Colors Titanium Black / Sterling Grey
Desert Gold / Clockwork Orange
Blue


Physical Specs
Length 2020 mm 2065 mm
Width 850 mm 800 mm
Height 1105 mm 1181 mm
Weight 145 kg --
Seat Height 790 871
Wheelbase -- 1384 mm
Ground Clearance -- 294 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 11.5 litres 8 litres
Overview
Features -- Broad, Accessible Powerband
Racing-Derived Ergonomics
Convenient Electric Start
Trail-Ready Dimensions
Robust, Compact Frame
Digital Ignition
Free-Flowing Intake
Forest-Friendly Exhaust
Low Maintenance Engine
Lightweight Swingarm
Comfortable Saddle
Racing Styling
Grippy Foot Pegs
Fork Protection
Additional Details Fuel type: Unleaded fuel only, RON/ROZ min. 95
Fuel Consumption :3.1 L/100 km
CO2 Emissions : 71 g/km
Rake (Caster Angle): 27.0°
Trail: 4.4 in
Wet Weight: 251 lb

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

5289