Brixton Cromwell 250 vs Yamaha 2022 XT250

Compare Specifications of Brixton Cromwell 250 and Yamaha 2022 XT250

Selected Bikes

Brixton Cromwell 250
Brixton Cromwell 250

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2022 XT250
Yamaha 2022 XT250

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 249.00 cc 249.00 cc
Engine Single cylinder four stroke engine, 4 valves, air-cooled Air-cooled SOHC 4-stroke single; 2 valves
Engine Starting Electric Electric Start
Fuel System -- Yamaha Fuel Injection (YFI)
Ignition ECU TCI: Transistor Controlled Ignition
Cooling System Air Cooled --
Maximum Power 16.8 PS @ 7500 RPM --
Maximum Torque 16.5 NM @ 6500 RPM --
Load Carrying Capacity 315 kg --
Seating Capacity 2 --
Transmission 5-speed manual 5-speed; multiplate wet clutch
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 --
Drivetrain -- Final Drive: Chain
Top Speed 114 kmph --
Display Digital --
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 100/90-18 2.75-21
Rear 120/80-17 120/80-18
Wheel / RIM Front Rim : 2.50 x 18
Rear Rim : 3.00 x 17
--
Brakes
Front Hydraulic disc brake with ABS, one brake disc 276 mm Single disc, 245mm
Rear Hydraulic disc brake with ABS, one brake disc 220 mm Single disc, 203mm
Suspension
Front Teleskopic fork 35mm telescopic fork; 8.9-in travel
Rear Swingarm with 2 shock absorbers Single shock, adjustable preload; 7.1-in travel
Colors Available
Colors Titanium Black / Sterling Grey
Desert Gold / Clockwork Orange
--


Physical Specs
Length 2020 mm 2148 mm
Width 850 mm 805 mm
Height 1105 mm 1160 mm
Weight 145 kg --
Seat Height 790 830
Wheelbase -- 1358 mm
Ground Clearance -- 284 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 11.5 litres 9 litres
Overview
Features -- Advanced LCD Instruments
Extended Fuel Range
Comfortable Saddle
Protective Fenders
Passenger-Ready
Bright Illumination
Dual Sport Lighting
Fork Protection
Forest-Friendly Exhaust
Modern Battery
Nimble Steering
Dirt-Ready Wheels
Low Maintenance Engine
Additional Details Fuel type: Unleaded fuel only, RON/ROZ min. 95
Fuel Consumption :3.1 L/100 km
CO2 Emissions : 71 g/km
Rake (Caster Angle): 26.4°
Trail: 4.2 in
Fuel Economy: 76 mpg
Wet Weight: 291 lb

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1301