Brixton Crossfire 500XC vs CCM GP450 Adventure

Compare Specifications of Brixton Crossfire 500XC and CCM GP450 Adventure

Selected Bikes

Brixton Crossfire 500XC
Brixton Crossfire 500XC

Brand:

Model:

CCM GP450 Adventure
CCM GP450 Adventure

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 486.00 cc 449.50 cc
Engine in-line, 2 cylinder, 4-stroke, water cooled Single cylinder, four-stroke
Engine Starting Electric --
Clutch -- Multiple-disc, wet, cable operated
Fuel System -- Injection. Electronic intake pipe / keihin digital engine with overrun fuel cut-off
Ignition ECU --
Cooling System Water cooled Liquid
Maximum Power 46.9 PS @ 8500 RPM 40.23 BHP
Maximum Torque 43 NM @ 6750 RPM 42.80 NM @ 6500 RPM
Load Carrying Capacity 355 kg --
Seating Capacity 2 --
Transmission 6-speed manual 5 Speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5
Top Speed 160 kmph --
Display Digital Display --
Frame -- 6061 T6 forged Aluminium , machined finish, lightweight bonded
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Fuel Economy
Overall Mileage -- 22.22 kmpl
Tyres
Front 110/80-19 --
Rear 150/60-17 --
Wheel / RIM Front Rim: 2,50x19 (external spokes)
Rear Rim: 4,25x17 (external spokes)
Spoke
Brakes
Front Hydraulic disc brake with ABS, disc-320mm 320 mm Disc
Rear Hydraulic disc brake with ABS, disc-240mm 320 mm Disc
Suspension
Front Upside-down shock absorber adjustable preload, compression damping, rebound damping 165 mm wheel travel. Marzocchi 45mm Dia Upside Down forks, Rebound & compression adjustments
Rear Single shock absorber adjustable preload, rebound damping 165 mm wheel travel. Cast Aluminium swingarm & polymer linkage system, Tractive shock absorber with Pre load ,damping & compression adjustment
Colors Available
Colors Desert Gold matt --


Physical Specs
Length 2164 mm 2170 mm
Width 851 mm --
Height 1203 mm 1475 mm
Weight 195 kg 125.5 kg
Seat Height 839 890
Wheelbase -- 1510 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 13.5 litres 20 litres
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Fuel Consumption : 4 l/100km
CO2 Emissions : 92 g/km
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

521