Brixton Crossfire 500XC vs Yamaha YZ450F Monster Energy Yamaha Racing Edition

Compare Specifications of Brixton Crossfire 500XC and Yamaha YZ450F Monster Energy Yamaha Racing Edition

Selected Bikes

Brixton Crossfire 500XC
Brixton Crossfire 500XC

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha YZ450F Monster Energy Yamaha Racing Edition
Yamaha YZ450F Monster Energy Yamaha Racing Edition

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 486.00 cc 449.00 cc
Engine in-line, 2 cylinder, 4-stroke, water cooled liquid-cooled DOHC 4-stroke; 4 titanium valves
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Fuel System -- Mikuni® fuel injection, 44mm
Ignition ECU --
Cooling System Water cooled --
Maximum Power 46.9 PS @ 8500 RPM --
Maximum Torque 43 NM @ 6750 RPM --
Load Carrying Capacity 355 kg --
Seating Capacity 2 --
Transmission 6-speed manual 5-speed; multiplate wet clutch
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 --
Top Speed 160 kmph --
Display Digital Display --
Frame -- bilateral beam aluminum frame
Handle Bar -- 1-1/8” aluminum tapered handlebars,
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 110/80-19 80/100-21 Dunlop® MX33®
Rear 150/60-17 120/80-19 Dunlop® MX33®
Wheel / RIM Front Rim: 2,50x19 (external spokes)
Rear Rim: 4,25x17 (external spokes)
Spoke
Brakes
Front Hydraulic disc brake with ABS, disc-320mm Hydraulic disc, 270mm
Rear Hydraulic disc brake with ABS, disc-240mm Hydraulic disc, 240mm
Suspension
Front Upside-down shock absorber adjustable preload, compression damping, rebound damping KYB spring-type fork with speed sensitive damping; fully adjustable, 12.2-in travel
Rear Single shock absorber adjustable preload, rebound damping KYB single shock; fully adjustable, 12.5-in travel
Colors Available
Colors Desert Gold matt --


Physical Specs
Length 2164 mm 2184 mm
Width 851 mm 825 mm
Height 1203 mm 1275 mm
Weight 195 kg 111 kg
Seat Height 839 965
Wheelbase -- 1473 mm
Ground Clearance -- 330 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 13.5 litres 6 litres
Overview
Features -- Yamaha Power Tuner App
Compact and Cutting-Edge Fuel-Injected Engine
Adjustable Fuel Mapping
Launch Control System (LCS)
Triple Clamp with Adjustable Handlebar Mounts
Embedded Graphics
Additional Details Fuel Consumption : 4 l/100km
CO2 Emissions : 92 g/km
Final Drive : Chain
Rake (Caster Angle) : 27.0
Trail : 4.7 in

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

317