Brixton Felsberg 125 XC vs Yamaha XTZ125

Compare Specifications of Brixton Felsberg 125 XC and Yamaha XTZ125

Selected Bikes

Brixton Felsberg 125 XC
Brixton Felsberg 125 XC

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha XTZ125
Yamaha XTZ125

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 125.00 cc 124.00 cc
Engine Single cylinder four stroke engine, air-cooled 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve, Single cylinder
Engine Starting Electric Electric starter and kickstarter
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Clutch -- Wet, multiple-disc
Fuel System -- Carburetor
Ignition ECU CDI (capacitor discharge ignition)
Cooling System Air-cooled Air cooled
Maximum Power 10.9 PS @ 9000 RPM 10.2 Ps @ 7500 Rpm
Maximum Torque 9.7 NM @ 6500 RPM 9.9 Nm @ 5500 Rpm
Load Carrying Capacity 304 kg --
Seating Capacity 2 --
Transmission 5-speed manual Constant mesh, 5-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 --
Top Speed 99 kmph --
Battery -- MTX7L-BS
Display -- Analogue Meter Panel
Frame -- Diamond
Headlamp LED 12V,35/35W×1
Taillamp LED 12V,21/5W×1
Tyres
Front 100/90-18 80/90-21M/C 48P Tube type
Rear 120/80-17 110/80-18M/C 58P Tube type
Wheel / RIM Front Rim: 2.50x18
Rear Rim: 3.00x17
--
Brakes
Front Hydraulic disc brake, brake disc: 276 mm Hydraulic single disc
Rear Hydraulic disc brake with CBS, brake disc: 220 mm Mechanical leading trailing drum
Suspension
Front Telescopic fork Telescopic fork
Rear Swingarm with dual schock absorbers Swingarm
Colors Available
Colors Quick Silver Yamaha Blue
Power Black


Physical Specs
Length 2070 mm 2090 mm
Width 850 mm 830 mm
Height 1120 mm 1115 mm
Weight 134 kg --
Seat Height 820 840
Wheelbase -- 1340 mm
Ground Clearance -- 260 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 11.5 litres 11 litres
Overview
Features Front mudguard
Underbody protection
- New Graphics
- Carrier
- Internal Balancer
Additional Details Fuel type: Unleaded fuel only, RON/ROZ min. 95
Fuel Consumption : 2,5 L/100 km
CO2 Emissions : 57 g/km
Engine oil capacity : 1.20L
Wet Weight (with oil and a full fuel tank) : 118kg

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8024