Brixton Felsberg 250 vs CFMoto 250NK

Compare Specifications of Brixton Felsberg 250 and CFMoto 250NK

Selected Bikes

Brixton Felsberg 250
Brixton Felsberg 250

Brand:

Model:

CFMoto 250NK
CFMoto 250NK

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 249.00 cc 249.20 cc
Engine Single cylinder four stroke engine, 4 valves, air-cooled Single cylinder, 4-stroke, liquid cooled, 4-valve, DOHC with balance shaft
Fuel System -- Bosch EFI
Ignition ECU --
Cooling System Air Cooled Liquid Cooled
Maximum Power 16.8 PS @ 7500 RPM 26 hp @ 9000 rpm
Maximum Torque 16.5 NM @ 6500 RPM 22 Nm @ 7500 rpm
Load Carrying Capacity 325 kg --
Seating Capacity 2 --
Transmission 5-speed manual 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Top Speed 114 kmph --
Headlamp LED LED
Taillamp LED LED
Tyres
Front 100/90-18 110/70R17 CST Radial on 3.5 in. Alloy
Rear 120/80-17 140/60R17 CST Radial on 4 in. Alloy
Wheel / RIM Front Rim: 2.50 x 18
Rear Rim: 3.00 x 17
Alloy
Brakes
Front Hydraulic disc brake with ABS, one brake disc 276 mm 300 mm single disc with twin-piston caliper
Rear Hydraulic disc brake with ABS, one brake disc 220 mm Single disc 245 mm with single piston caliper
Suspension
Front Teleskopic fork upside-down Upside down telescopic fork
Rear Swingarm with 2 shock absorbers Mid positioned monoshock
Colors Available
Colors Backstage Black
Timberwolf Grey
Backstage Black (2022)
Cargo Green (2022)
midnight black


Physical Specs
Length 2050 mm 1990 mm
Width 850 mm 780 mm
Height 1120 mm 1070 mm
Weight 155 kg 151 kg
Wheelbase -- 1360 mm
Ground Clearance -- 150 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 14.5 litres 12.5 litres
Overview
Features - KOSO LED indicators
- LED beams front and rear plus
- ABS Brakes And Adjustable Rear Shock Absorbers As Standard
- Bosch EFI for outstanding fuel economy & lower emissions
- Switchable ride modes from sport to rain
- Unlimited KM, 2 year factory warranty
Additional Details Fuel type: Unleaded fuel only, RON/ROZ min. 95
Fuel Consumption :3.2 L/100 km
CO2 Emissions : 73 g/km
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3398