Brixton Rayburn 125 vs Yamaha XTZ125

Compare Specifications of Brixton Rayburn 125 and Yamaha XTZ125

Selected Bikes

Brixton Rayburn 125
Brixton Rayburn 125

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha XTZ125
Yamaha XTZ125

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 125.00 cc 124.00 cc
Engine Single cylinder four stroke engine, air-cooled 4-stroke, SOHC, 2-valve, Single cylinder
Engine Starting Electric Electric starter and kickstarter
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Clutch -- Wet, multiple-disc
Fuel System -- Carburetor
Ignition ECU CDI (capacitor discharge ignition)
Cooling System Air-cooled Air cooled
Maximum Power 10.9 PS @ 9000 RPM 10.2 Ps @ 7500 Rpm
Maximum Torque 9.7 NM @ 6500 RPM 9.9 Nm @ 5500 Rpm
Load Carrying Capacity 304 kg --
Transmission 5-speed manual Constant mesh, 5-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5 --
Top Speed 95 kmph --
Battery -- MTX7L-BS
Display Digital Display Analogue Meter Panel
Frame -- Diamond
Headlamp LED 12V,35/35W×1
Taillamp LED 12V,21/5W×1
Tyres
Front 4.00-17 80/90-21M/C 48P Tube type
Rear 4.50-17 110/80-18M/C 58P Tube type
Wheel / RIM Front Rim: 2.50x17
Rear Rim: 3.00x17
--
Brakes
Front Hydraulic disc brake, brake disc: 276 mm Hydraulic single disc
Rear Hydraulic disc brake with CBS, brake disc: 220 mm Mechanical leading trailing drum
Suspension
Front Teleskopic fork Telescopic fork
Rear Swingarm with dual shock absorbers Swingarm
Colors Available
Colors Royal Blue matt / Horizon Blue matt
Bullet Silver / Sterling Grey
Yamaha Blue
Power Black


Physical Specs
Length 2020 mm 2090 mm
Width 760 mm 830 mm
Height 1060 mm 1115 mm
Weight 134 kg --
Seat Height 760 840
Wheelbase -- 1340 mm
Ground Clearance -- 260 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 11.5 litres 11 litres
Overview
Features -- - New Graphics
- Carrier
- Internal Balancer
Additional Details Fuel type: Unleaded fuel only, RON/ROZ min. 95
Fuel Consumption : 2.4 L/100 km
CO2 Emissions : 55 g/km
Engine oil capacity : 1.20L
Wet Weight (with oil and a full fuel tank) : 118kg

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6735