Buell 2022 Hammerhead 1190 vs Yamaha FJR1300AE

Compare Specifications of Buell 2022 Hammerhead 1190 and Yamaha FJR1300AE

Selected Bikes

Buell 2022 Hammerhead 1190
Buell 2022 Hammerhead 1190

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha FJR1300AE
Yamaha FJR1300AE

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 1190.00 cc 1298.00 cc
Engine ET-V2: 72° V-Twin, Liquid Cooled, Four-stroke Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke, DOHC, 4-valve, forward-inclined parallel 4-cylinder
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Clutch Hydraulic actuation, vacuum operated slipper --
Fuel System Electronic Fuel injection with 2 port injectors & 2 showerhead injectors Fuel Injection
Ignition -- TCI
Cooling System Liquid Cooled Liquid Cooled
Maximum Power 185 PS @ 10,600 RPM --
Maximum Torque 137.8 Nm @ 8200 RPM --
Load Carrying Capacity 375 lbs (170kg) --
Transmission Transmission Ratios:
1st 2.46
2nd 1.75
3rd 1.38
4th 1.17
5th 1.04
6th 0.96
Constant mesh 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain Primary Drive : Gear Drive 36/65
Final Drive ; 520 Z-ring chain, 16/41
--
Frame Aluminum frame with integral fuel reservoir Aluminium Diamond
Tyres
Front -- 120/70ZR17M/C (58W) Tubeless
Rear -- 180/55ZR17M/C(73W) Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Front Wheel: 17 x 3.5 Aluminum
Rear Wheel: 17 x 6.0 Aluminum
Alloy
Brakes
Front 386mm (15.19in.) Single perimeter rotor, 8 piston inside-out caliper Hydraulic dual discs, 320 mm - ABS
Rear 220mm (8.66in.) Disc, 2-piston Hayes Performance Brakes Caliper Hydraulic single disc, 282 mm - ABS
Suspension
Front Showa, inverted big piston front forks Telescopic forks
Rear Showa, single shock without linkage Swingarm (link suspension)
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 2040 mm 2230 mm
Width 737 mm 750 mm
Height 1110 mm 1325 mm
Weight 190 kg 292 kg
Seat Height 826 --
Wheelbase -- 1545 mm
Ground Clearance 120 mm 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity -- 25 litres
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Exhaust : Primary + Secondary
Swingarm : Optimized stiffness aluminum
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

4578