Carmela Carmela24 vs Kona Remote 160

Compare Specifications of Carmela Carmela24 and Kona Remote 160

Selected Bikes

Carmela Carmela24
Carmela Carmela24

Brand:

Model:

Kona Remote 160
Kona Remote 160

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor Three-fase permanent magnets Shimano E8000 25kph
Maximum Power 250 W --
Maximum Torque 29 Nm --
Gear Shift Pattern Gear : Sturmey Archer S-RK3 --
Top Speed 25 kmph --
Battery Battery Type : Li-Ion
Capacity : 280 Wh
Shimano 504Wh
Charger 3-4 hours Shimano STEPS
Display -- Shimano E8000 Cycle Computer
Frame -- Kona 6061 Aluminum Butted 160mm Travel
Stem Foldable Kona XC/BC 35
Handle Bar AL6065 580 mm, height 29 mm Kona XC/BC 35
Fork -- RockShox Lyrik Select Charger RC DebonAir 160mm Tapered 110 Spacing
Seats -- Seat Clamp : Kona Clamp
Seatpost -- Trans-X Dropper Internal 31.6mm
Grip -- Kona Key Grip
Crankset -- Shimano Deore
Pedals Foldable --
Chain -- SRAM SX-Eagle
Shifters -- SRAM NX
Saddle -- WTB Volt Pro
Headset -- FSA No.57E
Hub Front -- Formula 110x15mm
Hub Rear -- Formula 157x12mm
Spoke -- Stainless Black 14g
Chainrings -- 34t X-Sync Eagle
Tyres
Front 24 x 1.5, ERTRO 40-507 Maxxis Minion DHF EXO+ TR DUAL 27.5x2.8"
Rear 24 x 1.5, ERTRO 40-507 Maxxis Minion DHR II EXO+ TR DUAL 27.5x2.8"
Wheel / RIM Double-walled aluminium WTB KOM Trail i35 TCS
Tube -- Tapered Head Tube
Brakes
Front 180 mm Hydraulic disc brakes, Shimano BR-M315 200mm SRAM Centerline
Rear 160 mm Hydraulic disc brakes, Shimano BR-M315 200mm SRAM Centerline
Brake Lever -- SRAM Code R
Suspension
Front -- 160 mm
Rear -- 160 mm
Rear Shock: RockShox Super Deluxe Select
Colors Available
Colors White YS701 Gloss Seafoam or Charcoal w/ Crimson, Indigo & Dark Seafoam Decals


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight 15 kg --
Overview
Features -- - Tubeless Compatible Rims
- 12 x 157 mm Axle
- Beamer Independent Suspension
Additional Details Autonomy : 50 km
Bottom braket : Eccentric
USB ports : 2 ports, 2A total
Steering : Tange Seiki
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3284