CCM Spitfire Flat Tracker vs Kawasaki Ninja 650 Performance

Compare Specifications of CCM Spitfire Flat Tracker and Kawasaki Ninja 650 Performance

Selected Bikes

CCM Spitfire Flat Tracker
CCM Spitfire Flat Tracker

Brand:

Model:

Kawasaki Ninja 650 Performance
Kawasaki Ninja 650 Performance

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 600.00 cc 649.00 cc
Engine Single cylinder, Four-stroke Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke Parallel Twin
Engine Starting -- Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Forced lubrication, semi‑dry sump
Clutch Multiple-disc, wet, Hydraulic control Wet multi-disc, manual
Fuel System Injection: Mikuni D45 Fuel injection: Ø 36 mm x 2 with dual throttle valves
Cooling System Liquid Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 55 BHP 68 PS @ 8000 RPM
Maximum Torque 58 NM @ 5500 RPM 64 NM @ 6700 RPM
Transmission 6 Speed 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Frame High strength steel, Hand Tig welded Trellis, high-tensile steel
Headlamp -- LED
Fuel Economy
Overall Mileage 23.80 kmpl --
Tyres
Front Maxxis DTR1 Tubed FlatTrack Race tyre. 19”, 130 mm wide 120/70ZR17M/C (58W)
Rear Maxxis DTR1 Tubed FlatTrack Race tyre. 19”, 130 mm wide 160/60ZR17M/C (69W)
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front 320 mm Disc Dual semi-floating 300 mm petal discs. Caliper: Dual piston
Rear 240 mm Disc Single 220 mm petal disc. Caliper: Single-piston
Suspension
Front 120 mm wheel travel. Adjustable 41 mm telescopic fork
Rear 120 mm wheel travel. Adjustable Horizontal Back-link with adjustable preload
Colors Available
Colors -- Lime Green / Ebony (KRT Edition)
Pearl Flat Stardust White / Metallic Flat Spark Black Pearl Flat Stardust White / Metallic Flat Spark Black
Metallic Spark Black Metallic Spark Black


Physical Specs
Length 2145 mm 2055 mm
Width -- 740 mm
Height 1165 mm 1145 mm
Weight 142 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 193
Seat Height 825 --
Wheelbase 1455 mm 1410 mm
Ground Clearance 240 mm 130 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 14 litres 15 litres
Overview
Features -- - ABS
- HORIZONTAL BACK-LINK REAR SUSPENSION
- ECONOMICAL RIDING INDICATOR
- SMARTPHONE CONNECTIVITY
Additional Details -- Final drive : Sealed chain
Primary Reduction Ratio : 2.095 (88/42)
Gear Ratios 1st : 2.438 (39/16)
Gear Ratios 2nd : 1.714 (36/21)
Gear Ratios 3rd : 1.333 (32/24)
Gear Ratios 4th : 1.111 (30/27)
Gear Ratios 5th : 0.966 (28/29)
Gear Ratios 6th : 0.852 (23/27)
Final reduction ratio : 3.067 (46/15)
Trail : 100 mm
Wheel travel front : 125 mm
Wheel travel rear : 130 mm
Fuel consumption : 35 kW kit 4.5 l/100 km
CO2 emission : 35 kW kit 107 g/km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

7690