Cervelo S5 Ultegra Di2 vs Lapierre Trekking 2.0 2022

Compare Specifications of Cervelo S5 Ultegra Di2 and Lapierre Trekking 2.0 2022

Selected Bikes

Cervelo S5 Ultegra Di2
Cervelo S5 Ultegra Di2

Brand:

Model:

Lapierre Trekking 2.0 2022
Lapierre Trekking 2.0 2022

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Frame -- Trekking 700c Supreme 4 Alloy
Stem Cervélo, CS28 V-Stem AS-DC1 Alloy Ø: 25.4mm L: 75mm R:15°
Handle Bar Cervélo, AB08 NR-AL-16 Alloy W: 610mm R: 26mm R:23°
Fork Cervélo All-Carbon, Tapered S5 Fork For Disc Suntour M3010 700C V-Brake
Seatpost Cervélo Carbon, SP20 SP-C208 Alloy Ø: 27.2mm L: 350mm
Grip -- Herrmans DD08 120mm
Crankset Shimano Ultegra 8000 52/36 Shimano TY301 48x38x28T 170mm (S/M/L) 175mm (XL/XXL)
Pedals -- Xerama SP-877
Chain Shimano CN-HG701, 11 spd S50 1/2"x 3/32" 7s
Shifters Shimano Ultegra 8070, 11 spd --
Saddle Prologo Dimension TiRox Selle Royal Wave
Headset FSA IS2 1 x 1-3/8 FSA NO.10 Semi-Integrated
Derailleur Front Shimano Ultegra Di2 8050, 11 spd Shimano Tourney FDTY300
Derailleur Rear Shimano Ultegra Di2 8050, 11 spd Shimano RDTY300D 7s
Hub Front -- Panasonic NRH002 Dynamo 32H
Hub Rear -- Shimano TY500 32H
Cassette Shimano Ultegra CS-R8000, 11-30 --
Sprocket -- Shimano HG200 12-32T 7s
Bottom Bracket -- Square 122.5mm
Headlamp -- AXA Ecoline 15 Lux
Taillamp -- Axa Blueline Carrier Mount
Tyres
Front Vittoria Corsa TLR G2.0 25c MITAS Hook 700 X 40c 622-42
Rear Vittoria Corsa TLR G2.0 25c MITAS Hook 700 X 40c 622-42
Wheel / RIM DT Swiss ARC 1450 62 Disc Lapierre Double Wall 32H 622-21c
Brakes
Front -- Alhonga V-Brake
Rear -- --
Brake Lever -- Shimano STEF41 3x7s
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 15.3 kg
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Bottom Bracket : Cervélo BBright Connect 24 x 90

Brake Caliper : Shimano Ultegra 8070 Hydraulic Disc

Brake Rotor : Shimano SM-RT800, 160 mm
Frame size : S,M,L,XL,XXL
Accessories Barfly for Cervélo Computer Mount --

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3492