Cinelli Journal vs Kona Process 153 29

Compare Specifications of Cinelli Journal and Kona Process 153 29

Selected Bikes

Cinelli Journal
Cinelli Journal

Brand:

Model:

Kona Process 153 29
Kona Process 153 29

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Frame COLUMBUS Cromor double butted steel Kona 6061 Aluminum Butted 153 mm Travel
Stem CINELLI 6061 Stem Kona XC/BC 35
Handle Bar CINELLI 6061 Flat Handlebar Size 680 (XS-SML) Kona XC/BC 35
Fork COLUMBUS Cr-Mo steel 1-1 / 8 " RockShox Yari RC Motion Control DebonAir 160 mm Tapered 110 mm Spacing
Seats -- Seat Clamp : Kona Clamp
Seatpost CINELLI 6061 Seat Post 31.6 mm Trans-X dropper post
Grip -- Kona Key Grip
Crankset -- SRAM SX Eagle
Chain -- SRAM SX-Eagle
Shifters -- SRAM SX-Eagle
Saddle CINELLI SSM Era custom WTB Volt Comp
Headset External 1-1 / 8 " FSA No.57B
Hub Front -- 148 x 12 mm Formula
Hub Rear -- 110 x 15 mm Formula
Spoke -- Stainless Black 14 g
Cassette 17T fixed cog / 18T freewheel --
Chainrings -- 32 t X-Sync Eagle
Sprocket 17T fixed cog / 18T freewheel --
Tyres
Front Duro Hypersonic / 700 x 25c 29 x 2.5 Maxxis Assegai EXO TR DUAL WT
Rear Duro Hypersonic / 700 x 25c 29 x 2.4 Maxxis Minion DHR II EXO TR DUAL WT
Wheel / RIM SHINING / 700c / 28H / KT Hubs WTB ST i29 TCS 29
Free Wheel : SRAM NX-Eagle 11-50 t 12spd
Brakes
Front Promax RC-452 200 mm SRAM Guide T 4-piston brakes,SRAM Centerline
Rear Promax RC-452 180 mm Rear Rotor, SRAM Centerline
Brake Lever -- SRAM Guide T
Suspension
Front -- 160 mm
Rear -- 153 mm
Rear Shock : RockShox Deluxe Select Plus Trunnion
Colors Available
Colors Gray Sky Morning Gloss Charcoal-Blue with Mint Green
Chalk
Grey-Blue Decals


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Overview
Features -- - Internal Headset
- Tapered Head Tube
- Tubeless Compatible Rims
- 12 x 148 mm AXLE
- Beamer Independent Suspension
Additional Details Tape : Velo grips
Bottom Bracket : FSA / BSA 68 mm
Drivetrain : SRAM NX/SX Eagle 12spd
Cockpit : Kona XC/BC 35 mm Bar/ XC/BC 35 Stem with Kona Lock-on Key Grip

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9109