CityCoco Fat Bike vs Garelli Ciclone E4 Cross

Compare Specifications of CityCoco Fat Bike and Garelli Ciclone E4 Cross

Selected Bikes

CityCoco Fat Bike
CityCoco Fat Bike

Brand:

Model:

Garelli Ciclone E4 Cross
Garelli Ciclone E4 Cross

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor 250 W BAFANG Hub Brushless Motor 36V Electric Brushless
Range Up to 50 Km (Turkey provides an actual range of 40-45 Km depending on the inclination and driver weight under road conditions) Up to 110 km in Eco Mode (35 Km / h)
Up to 100 km in Tour Mode (45 Km / h)
Up to 70 km in Sport Mode (70 Km / h)
Charging Time 4-6 Hours 6/8 hours with standard battery charger, 3/4 hours with optional Fast Charger
Energy supplied : 2500 Wh
Charging cycle : 800
Maximum Power -- 4 Kw
Maximum Torque -- 160 Nm
Top Speed 25 kmph --
Battery 13 Ah, 36 V Lithium-Ion - Removable LG 72v / 35 Ah Lithium Ion, removable Battery
Battery Weight : 13 Kg
Charger 140 / 250V Input 36V-2.5Ah Output DC Adapter --
Display -- LCD + ANALOGIG with CANBUS
Frame -- Alluminium Alloy
Fork -- Front fork : Hydraulic up-side down telescopic
Saddle Faux leather seat --
Headlamp -- LED E-mark 16000
Tyres
Front 24 * 4.00 inch / Tubeless 130/60-13 53 J
Rear 24 * 4.00 inch / Tubeless 130/60-13 53 J
Wheel / RIM Spoke 13 inch rim
Brakes
Front Disc Disk hydraulic 220 mm
Rear Disc Disk hydraulic 220 mm
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Green
White
Orange
Blue
Yellow
Red
--


Physical Specs
Length -- 1669 mm
Width -- 750 mm
Weight -- 68 kg
Seat Height -- 820
Wheelbase -- 1195 mm
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Gear : 7 Speed ​​Shimano Acera
Lighting : There is
Indicator : LCD Display
Battery Level : LCD Display
KM Counter : LCD Display
Transmission : rear wheel
Rear dumper : Monoshock Hydraulic with adjustable gear
Kickstand : Sidestand
Passengers : 2
Max Load : 150 kg
Accessories Rear Sausage Bag : Optional
Front Sausage Bag : Optional
Side Bag : Optional
Rear Basket : Optional
Mirror E11 : Optional
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3148