Civia Loring Version 1 I-Motion 3 Speed vs Marin San Rafael DS2

Compare Specifications of Civia Loring Version 1 I-Motion 3 Speed and Marin San Rafael DS2

Selected Bikes

Civia Loring Version 1 I-Motion 3 Speed
Civia Loring Version 1 I-Motion 3 Speed

Brand:

Model:

Marin San Rafael DS2
Marin San Rafael DS2

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Frame Loring Series 2 Dual Sport, 6061 Aluminum, 700C Wheels, Disc Brake
Stem Truativ XR 12degree rise Marin Alloy
Handle Bar Loring Swept 80degree Marin Alloy Riser
Fork Loring Steel SR Suntour NEX Disc HLO, 63 mm Travel, Hydraulic Lockout, Preload Adjustment
Seatpost Truativ XR 350 mm 27.2 mm Marin Alloy
Grip -- Marin Ergonomic Locking
Crankset Truvativ Isoflow 3-piece Shimano FC-TY301, 48/38/28T, Ring Guard
Pedals -- Dual Sport Platform
Chain -- KMC Z7
Shifters -- Shift Lever : Shimano EF505 3x8-Speed
Saddle Brooks B-67 Marin Fitness Plush
Headset Cane Creek SC-1 FSA No.10-P
Derailleur Front -- Shimano FD-TY710
Derailleur Rear -- Shimano Altus 8-Speed
Hub Front -- Forged Aluminum Alloy, Centerlock Disc, 32H
Hub Rear -- Forged Aluminum Alloy, Centerlock Disc, 32H
Spoke -- 14 g Black Stainless Steel
Cassette -- SunRace 8-Speed, 11-32T
Tyres
Front Panaracer Pasela 26 x 1.75 with Tourgaurd flat protection Vee Tire, Rail, 700 x 40, Wire Bead
Rear Panaracer Pasela 26 x 1.75 with Tourgaurd flat protection Vee Tire, Rail, 700 x 40, Wire Bead
Wheel / RIM -- Marin Aluminum Double Wall, Disc Specific
Brakes
Front Avid BB5 mechanical disc Shimano BR-M200 Hydraulic Disc, 160 mm Rotor
Rear Avid BB5 mechanical disc Shimano BR-M200 Hydraulic Disc, 160 mm Rotor
Brake Lever SRAM FR5 Shimano EF-505 Hydraulic
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Overview
Features -- - Series 2 Aluminum Frame
- Disc Brakes
Additional Details Fenders : Loring Bamboo
Front/Rear Rack : Loring Aluminum/Bamboo
Kickstand : Pletscher two-leg
Bottom Bracket : Sealed Cartridge Bearings, Square Taper

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9628