Co-Motion Divide vs Omnium CXC Steel

Compare Specifications of Co-Motion Divide and Omnium CXC Steel

Selected Bikes

Co-Motion Divide
Co-Motion Divide

Brand:

Model:

Omnium CXC Steel
Omnium CXC Steel

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Frame Co-Motion-designed Reynolds 725 heat treated double butted Cro-Moly tubing --
Stem -- 3D forged 6061 aluminium, oversize, 80mm standard
Handle Bar -- 6061 aluminium, 700mm wide, 15mm rise, oversize, straight riser
Fork Co-Motion taper-gauge Cro-Moly with CNC steerer --
Seatpost -- 27.2mm forged alloy 6061 aluminium, T6
Grip -- Omnium, black, foam
Crankset -- Driveline, 42t wide narrow, CNC Chainring
Pedals -- Cast metal platform, black
Shifters SRAM Apex 11-speed / SRAM Apex Double Tap levers --
Gear -- Sram Apex 1×11
Saddle Co-Motion 31.6 / Selle Italia XR Flow Velo, leather, Chro-mo
Headset Cane Creek 40 series FSA, sealed bearings (1-1/8″ EC34)
Derailleur Front SRAM Apex 11-speed / SRAM Apex Double Tap levers --
Derailleur Rear SRAM Apex 11-speed / SRAM Apex Double Tap levers --
Bottom Bracket -- FSA, Square Taper (68mm BSA english thread)
Tyres
Front WTB Venture 700 x 50 mm WTB Byway 700×40
Rear WTB Venture 700 x 50 mm WTB Byway 700×40
Wheel / RIM Hand built with Velocity Cliffhanger 29er rims Omnium Wheelset 622 (700c)
Brakes
Front Avid BB7 160 mm Disc Sram Level TL
Rear Avid BB7 160 mm Disc Sram Level TL
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Overview
Features - Rugged and tough Reynolds 725 steel tubing with integrated chain-stay yoke
- Proven Co-Motion touring geometry
- Rack and Fender mounts plus three bottle mounts
--
Additional Details Drivetrain : FSA V-drive 32t crank / SRAM 11-42t NX cassette
Cockpit : FSA Gossamer stem / Omega compact handlebar
Sizes : XS 51, S 53, M 56, L 59, XL 62, XXL 64
40mm clearance with mudguards(50mm chainstay clearence)
Axles : 100x12mm front & 142x12mm rear
Q-Factor : 145 mm
Single Speed : YBN chain & 15t SS adaptor

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3295