Corratec CCT EVO Pro Disc vs QWIC FN7.1

Compare Specifications of Corratec CCT EVO Pro Disc and QWIC FN7.1

Selected Bikes

Corratec CCT EVO Pro Disc
Corratec CCT EVO Pro Disc

Brand:

Model:

QWIC FN7.1
QWIC FN7.1

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel -- Electric
Motor -- Front wheel drive (QWIC)
Range -- Till 180 km
Charging Time -- 8 hrs
Maximum Torque -- 39.5 NM
Battery -- 375 Wh - 625 Wh
18650 NCM LI-ion
Battery Removable
Display -- Digital Display
Frame Corratec CCT EVO SL Disc Sizes : S, M, L, XL
Stem ZZYZX SL Alloy Stem, ICR: Internal Cable Routing Adjustable Stem
Handle Bar ZZYZX SL Carbon Handlebar --
Fork Corratec Pro Control Carbon Fork Disc Springy Front Fork
Seatpost ZZYZX Carbon Seatpost --
Saddle Selle Italia Model X W145 --
Derailleur Front SRAM Force eTAP AXS --
Derailleur Rear SRAM Force eTAP AXS --
Cassette SRAM XG1270 --
Chainrings Chainwheel : 2s; 48/35 SRAM Force DUB --
Headlamp -- Axa Echo 30 Lux
Tyres
Front 25 mm Continental GP5000 Schwalbe Energizer Plus
Rear 25 mm Continental GP5000 Schwalbe Energizer Plus
Wheel / RIM -- Spoke
Brakes
Front 160 mm SRAM Force eTAP hydraulic Disc Shimano V-Brake
Rear 160 mm SRAM Force eTAP hydraulic Disc Shimano Rollerbrake
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors -- Dark Antracite
Steel Blue


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 23.9 kg
Overview
About -- QWIC Premium Series Read More
Features - Frame manufactured with EPS technology that ensures a stiffer, lighter and more consistent frame
- Amazing size geometries adapted to the customer needs - PRO SIZE 6 System
- Low Profile Chainstay to avoid chain rattling - LPC
- Pro Control Fork
- Digital integrated intelligence
- Internal cable routing
- Taperated head tube
- Award winning e-bike: Best in “Nationale Fietstest, Telegraaf 2018”
- Lightweight frame with low step-through
- Luggage Carrier
- USB Functions
Additional Details Shift Levers : SRAM Force eTAP AXS Gear : Shimano Nexus 7
Boarding Height : 39.5 m
Programs : 8

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1904