Corratec LifeS AP5 vs Propella 7-Speed (V4.0)

Compare Specifications of Corratec LifeS AP5 and Propella 7-Speed (V4.0)

Selected Bikes

Corratec LifeS AP5
Corratec LifeS AP5

Brand:

Model:

Propella 7-Speed (V4.0)
Propella 7-Speed (V4.0)

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor -- MANUFACTURER: BAFANG REAR GEARED HUB 250 WATT (400 WATT PEAK)
Range -- 20-40 MILES
Charging Time -- 2.5-HOUR
Maximum Torque 50 Nm --
Top Speed 25 kmph 30 kmph
Battery BOSCH PowerPack 500 Performance Lithium-ion battery REMOVABLE, 36 VOLT (250 WATT-HOUR), 3.5 LBS (1.6 KG), SAMSUNG LI-ION CELLS
Frame One Size Frame fits for (almost) every Person
Unique frame geometry ensures to place both feets on the ground while sitting comfortable on the saddle
ALUMINIUM ALLOY
Stem Ergotec Vorbau Cobra ZOOM 90 MM ALLOY
Handle Bar Ergotec Bügel EWG ZOOM ALLOY
Fork Corratec Life S Fork ALUMINIUM ALLOY
Seatpost 30.9 mm ZZYZX Alloy 27.2 MM ALLOY
Crankset -- LASCO 170MM ALLOY CRANK ARM
Pedal Assist System -- 5-LEVEL PEDAL-ASSIST
Chain -- KMC
Shifters -- SHIMANO ALTUS 7-SPEED
Saddle Corratec Trekking Saddle --
Derailleur Front -- SHIMANO ALTUS 7-SPEED
Derailleur Rear Shimano Nexus SHIMANO ALTUS 7-SPEED
Cassette 8s ; 16 Shimano Nexus --
Chainrings Chainwheel : 1s ; 38 ZZYZX E-Power Crank LASCO 46T ALLOY
Tyres
Front 76 mm clincher with tubes Innova 20 x 30" CST XPEDIUM PUNCTURE-RESISTANT 700C X 35 TIRES (50-75 PSI)
Rear 76 mm clincher with tubes Innova 20 x 30" CST XPEDIUM PUNCTURE-RESISTANT 700C X 35 TIRES (50-75 PSI)
Wheel / RIM -- ANODIZED BLUE ALLOY 700C
Brakes
Front 180 mm Shimano MT 200 SHIMANO TX-805 MECHANICAL DISC
Rear 160 mm Shimano MT 200 SHIMANO TX-805 MECHANICAL DISC
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 16.8 kg
Overview
Features - Integrated Engine Technology
- Hybrid
- Internal Cabel routing
- Through Axle
--
Additional Details Shift Levers : Shimano NEXUS Revo Shifter
Lights : Herrmans MR GO
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8284