CSC RX3 Adventure vs Kawasaki Versys X 300 Adventure

Compare Specifications of CSC RX3 Adventure and Kawasaki Versys X 300 Adventure

Selected Bikes

CSC RX3 Adventure
CSC RX3 Adventure

Brand:

Model:

Kawasaki Versys X 300 Adventure
Kawasaki Versys X 300 Adventure

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 250.00 cc 296.00 cc
Engine NC250 Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke Parallel Twin,DOHC, 8 valves
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Forced lubrication, wet sump
Clutch -- Wet multi-disc, manual
Fuel System Delphi EFI Fuel injection: Ø 32 mm x 2 with dual throttle valves
Cooling System Liquid Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 24.8 Ps @ 9000 Rpm 40 PS @ 11500 RPM
Maximum Torque 22.5 Nm @ 7000 Rpm 25.7 NM @ 10000 RPM
Transmission 6 Speed 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Top Speed 135 kmph --
Battery 12V11Ah --
Frame -- Backbone, high-tensile steel
Fuel Economy
Overall Mileage 27.6 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 100/90R19 100/90-19M/C 57S
Rear 130/70R17 130/80-17M/C 65S
Wheel / RIM -- Spoke
Brakes
Front ABS Brakes Single 290 mm petal disc. Caliper: Single balanced actuation dual piston
Rear ABS Brakes Single 220 mm petal disc. Caliper: Dual piston
Suspension
Front -- 41 mm telescopic fork
Rear -- Bottom-Link Uni-Trak, gas-charged shock and adjustable preload
Colors Available
Colors Blue
Blue
Candy Lime Green
Metallic Spark Black


Physical Specs
Length 2129 mm 2170 mm
Width 869 mm 860 mm
Height 1260 mm 1390 mm
Weight 174.6 kg --
Seat Height 795 845
Wheelbase 1399 mm 1450 mm
Ground Clearance 211 mm 180 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 19 litres 17 litres
Overview
Features -- - Handguards
- Engine Guards
- Panniers 2x17L
Additional Details -- Trail : 108 mm
Wheel travel front : 130 mm
Wheel travel rear : 148 mm
Final drive : Sealed chain
Primary Reduction Ratio : 3.087 (71/23)
Gear Ratios 1st : 2.714 (38/14)
Gear Ratios 2nd : 1.789 (34/19)
Gear Ratios 3rd : 1.409 (31/22)
Gear Ratios 4th : 1.160 (29/25)
Gear Ratios 5th : 1.000 (27/27)
Gear Ratios 6th : 0.857 (24/28)
Final reduction ratio : 3.286 (46/14)
Fuel consumption : 4.1 l/100 km
CO2 emission : 103 g/km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2545