CSC RX3 Adventure vs Yamaha XV250P (Police)

Compare Specifications of CSC RX3 Adventure and Yamaha XV250P (Police)

Selected Bikes

CSC RX3 Adventure
CSC RX3 Adventure

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha XV250P (Police)
Yamaha XV250P (Police)

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 250.00 cc 249.00 cc
Engine NC250 Air-cooled, 4-stroke, SOHC, V-type, 2-cylinder
Engine Starting Electric Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Clutch -- Wet, multiple disc
Fuel System Delphi EFI Carburetor
Recommended fuel : Regular unleaded gasoline (Gasohol [E10] acceptable)
Ignition -- TCI
Cooling System Liquid --
Maximum Power 24.8 Ps @ 9000 Rpm 15.5 kW @ 8000 RPM
Maximum Torque 22.5 Nm @ 7000 Rpm 20.7 NM @ 6500 RPM
Transmission 6 Speed --
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2--3-4-5-6
Drivetrain -- Final drive : Chain
Top Speed 135 kmph --
Battery 12V11Ah 12 V, 10.0 Ah
Frame -- Double cradle
Gear -- Gear ratio 1st/2nd/3rd/4th/5th : 2.643 (37/14), 1.684 (32/19), 1.261(29/23), 1.000 (26/26), 0.821(23/28)
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Fuel Economy
Overall Mileage 27.6 kmpl --
Tyres
Front 100/90R19 3.00-18 47P tube-type
Rear 130/70R17 130/90-15M/C 66P tube-type
Wheel / RIM -- Front wheel travel : 140 mm
Rear wheel travel: 100 mm
Brakes
Front ABS Brakes 282 mm Single disc
Rear ABS Brakes 130 mm brake drum inside diameter
Suspension
Front -- Telescopic forks
Rear -- Swingarm
Colors Available
Colors Blue
Blue
--


Physical Specs
Length 2129 mm 2215 mm
Width 869 mm 770 mm
Height 1260 mm 1150 mm
Weight 174.6 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 150
Seat Height 795 685
Wheelbase 1399 mm 1495 mm
Ground Clearance 211 mm 150 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 19 litres 9.5 litres
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details -- Oil tank capacity : 1.8 liters
Primary reduction ratio : 3.130 (72/23)
Secondary reduction ratio : 2.813 (45/16)
Caster angle : 32°05'
Trail : 119 mm
Accessories -- - Front flashing light
- Rear adjustable flashing light (Photo)
- Siren & speaker
- Side cases
- Engine guard

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1486