Derbi Senda Racing 50 SM vs Yamaha 2022 TT-R50E

Compare Specifications of Derbi Senda Racing 50 SM and Yamaha 2022 TT-R50E

Selected Bikes

Derbi Senda Racing 50 SM
Derbi Senda Racing 50 SM

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha 2022 TT-R50E
Yamaha 2022 TT-R50E

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 50.00 cc 49.00 cc
Engine Single cylinder 2-stroke engine with light alloy cylinder, liquid cooled Air-cooled SOHC 4-stroke; 2 valves
Engine Starting Kick Starter Electric Start
Engine Lubrication Automatic mixer --
Clutch Multi plate wet clutch Automatic Clutch
Fuel System With electronically controlled DELL'ORTO PHVA 17.5 carburettor Mikuni VM11 carburetor
Ignition -- CDI
Transmission 6 speed
Drive ratio:
1st 11/34
2nd 15/30
3rd 18/27
4th 20/24
5th 22/23
6th 23/22
Constant-mesh 3-speed;
Drivetrain -- Final Drive: Chain
Frame Twin-tube steel frame --
Gear Primary Drive: Straight Cut Gears, Gear Ratio: 21/78
Final Drive: Chain, Gear Ratio: 11/59
--
Saddle Saddle height: 865 mm --
Tyres
Front 100/80 – 17” 2.50-10-4PR
Rear 130/70 -17” 2.50-10-4PR
Wheel / RIM Wheel travel 200 mm
Rims: Lightweight alloy wheels,
Front: 2.75 X 17"
Rear: 3.5 X 17”
--
Brakes
Front Ø 260 mm stainless steel disc with floating calliper, 2 pistons Drum, 80mm
Rear Ø 220 mm stainless steel disc with floating calliper Drum, 80mm
Suspension
Front Upside down fork with Ø 41 mm stanchions, wheel travel 240 mm Telescopic fork; 3.8-in travel
Rear Swingarm in high resistance steel. Hydraulic monoshock absorber Single shock; 2.8-in travel
Colors Available
Colors Black and Yellow Blue


Physical Specs
Length 2045 mm 1305 mm
Width 815 mm 594 mm
Height -- 795 mm
Kerb Weight 104 --
Seat Height -- 556
Wheelbase 1390 mm 924 mm
Ground Clearance -- 134 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 7 litres 3 litres
Overview
Features -- Useable, Entry-Level Engine
Responsive Power
Low Maintenance Engine
Digital Ignition
Forest-Friendly Exhaust
Compact Conventional Fork
Durable Knobby Tires
Ultra-Low Seat Height
Standard Security
Adjustable Restrictor
Racing Style
Folding Side Stand
Grippy Foot Pegs
Additional Details Consumption: 3,14 L/100 Km
Co2 Emissions: 76 G / Km
Approval: Euro 4
Rake (Caster Angle): 25.5°
Trail: 1.3 in
Wet Weight: 128 lb

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3138