Fantic Caballero Scrambler 500 vs SWM SM 500 R

Compare Specifications of Fantic Caballero Scrambler 500 and SWM SM 500 R

Selected Bikes

Fantic Caballero Scrambler 500
Fantic Caballero Scrambler 500

Brand:

Model:

SWM SM 500 R
SWM SM 500 R

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 449.00 cc 501.00 cc
Engine Single cylinder 4 stroke, liquid-cooled, Euro5, Single camshaft - 4 valve Single cylinder, 4 stroke; DOHC; 6 Speed gears; Euro 5
Engine Starting Electric Electric and Kick
Clutch Multi plate wet clutch --
Fuel System Electronic Fuel injection - throttle body ø 40mm --
Cooling System Liquid cooled --
Maximum Power 40 HP @ 7500 RPM --
Maximum Torque 43 NM @ 6000 RPM --
Transmission -- 6 Speed gears
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Frame CrMo steel central-tube frame Single-beam double cradle frame in steel tubes
Gear 6 --
Tyres
Front 110/80 R19 120/70 x 17” – Michelin Pilot Power 2CT
Rear 140/80 R17 150/60 x 17” – Michelin Pilot Power 2CT
Wheel / RIM Spoked with aluminum rims Spoke
Brakes
Front -- Floating disc 320 mm BREMBO, hydraulic control and radial caliper with ABS ;
Rear -- Fixed disc 240mm BREMBO, hydraulic control and floating caliper with switchable ABS;
ABS Continental two-channel ABS (disengageable) --
Suspension
Front ø41mm upside down
Front suspension travel: 150mm
KAYABA, Upside down telescopic hydraulic fork with advanced axle, rebound dumping adjustment; Fork legs Ø 48mm
Rear Rebound damping regulation
Rear suspension travel: 150mm
Rear suspension travel: 150mm
KAYABA, Progressive “soft damp” single hydraulic shock absorber, spring preload, compression and rebound adjustements
Colors Available
Colors -- White and Red


Physical Specs
Length 2080 mm --
Weight -- 120 kg
Kerb Weight 150 --
Seat Height 820 920
Wheelbase 14825 mm --
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Exhaust system : Dual exhaust by ARROW
Fuel consumption : 4,2 l/100 km
CO2 emission : 97 g/km
Swingarm: In steel with variable section and progressive link
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

3227