Fantic XEF 125 Performance vs Husqvarna 2023 TE 150

Compare Specifications of Fantic XEF 125 Performance and Husqvarna 2023 TE 150

Selected Bikes

Fantic XEF 125 Performance
Fantic XEF 125 Performance

Brand:

Model:

Husqvarna 2023 TE 150
Husqvarna 2023 TE 150

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 124.60 cc 143.99 cc
Engine Single cylinder 4 strokes Euro5, SOHC 4-valve, Variable camshaft timing 1-cylinder, 2-stroke engine
Engine Starting Electric Kick and electric starter
Clutch Wet multidisc, back-torque limiter DS wet multi-disc clutch, Braktec hydraulics
Ignition Electronic --
Cooling System Liquid cooled --
Maximum Power 15 PS @ 9.750 RPM --
Maximum Torque 11.8 NM @ 6750 RPM --
Seating Capacity -- 1
Transmission -- 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Drivetrain -- Chain X-Ring 5/8 x 1/4"
Frame Perimeter frame steel CrMo Central double-cradle-type 25CrMo4 steel
Handle Bar 22 steel --
Tyres
Front 90/90x21 --
Rear 120/90x18 --
Wheel / RIM Aluminium, black anodized Spoke
Brakes
Front Disc “Wave” ø260mm - combined brake system Disc brake 260 mm
Rear Disc “Wave” ø220mm, combined brake system Disc brake 220 mm
Suspension
Front FANTIC ø41mm USD WP XPLOR-USD, Ø 48 mm
Rear FANTIC 125 – preload regulation WP XACT Monoshock with linkage
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 2110 mm --
Weight 112 kg 99.6 kg
Seat Height 915 950
Wheelbase 1420 mm --
Ground Clearance -- 360 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 7.5 litres 9 litres
Overview
Features -- - Ultra lightweight punch
- Composite carbon fibre subframe
- Integrated cooling and radiators
- Hydraulic brakes
- Hydraulic clutch
- Bodywork
- CNC machined triple clamp
- Electric start and wiring harness
- Engine management system
Additional Details Fuel consumption: 1,8 l/100 km
Swingarm: Steel, progressive link
Triple clamps: Forged aluminum
Exhaust:Manifold and muffler Euro5 by ARROW
CO2 Emission: 43 g/km
EMS: Continental EMS
Steering Head Angle: 63.5 °
Suspension Travel (Front): 300 Mm
Suspension Travel (Rear): 300 Mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1589