Fantic XMF 125 Competition vs Motomel Skua 125 Xtreme

Compare Specifications of Fantic XMF 125 Competition and Motomel Skua 125 Xtreme

Selected Bikes

Fantic XMF 125 Competition
Fantic XMF 125 Competition

Brand:

Model:

Motomel Skua 125 Xtreme
Motomel Skua 125 Xtreme

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 124.60 cc 124.00 cc
Engine Single cylinder 4 strokes Euro5, liquid cooled , SOHC 4-valve, Variable camshaft timing Single cylinder 4T
Engine Starting Electric Electric and kick
Clutch Wet multidisc, back-torque limiter Manual
Fuel System Electronic fuel injection --
Ignition Electronic --
Cooling System Liquid cooled Air Cooled
Maximum Power 15 PS @ 9.750 RPM 10.5 Hp @ 8000 RPM
Maximum Torque 11.8 NM @ 6.750 RPM --
Load Carrying Capacity -- 150 kg
Transmission -- 5 speeds
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5
Top Speed -- 85 kmph
Display -- Analogue
Frame Perimeter frame steel CrMo
Sub frame: Removable in steel
--
Handle Bar ø28 aluminum --
Gear 6 --
Headlamp -- LED
Taillamp -- LED
Tyres
Front 100/80x17 70 / 100 - 19
Rear 130/70x17 90 / 100 - 16
Wheel / RIM Aluminium, black anodized Spoke
Brakes
Front Disc “Wave” ø320mm Disc
Rear Disc “Wave” ø220mm, combined brake system Disc
Suspension
Front FANTIC FRS ø41mm USD, racing setup, forged aluminium fork bottoms Hydraulic fork
Rear FANTIC FRS 125 Piggyback – preload and hydraulic regulation Monoshock
Colors Available
Colors -- Black
Red
White
Blue


Physical Specs
Length 2110 mm 2150 mm
Width -- 770 mm
Height -- 1050 mm
Weight -- 115 kg
Kerb Weight 112 --
Seat Height 880 --
Wheelbase 1435 mm --
Fuel Tank Capacity 7.5 litres 7.5 litres
Overview
Features -- - New Front Optics
- New Dashboard
- Lobed Disc Front And Rear Brake
- Raised Fender
- Wide Seat With Non-Slip Upholstery And Double Texture.
Additional Details Exhaust: Manifold and muffler Euro5 by ARROW
Fuel consumption: 1,8 l/100 km
CO2 Emission : 43 g/km
Swingarm: steel, progressive link
Triple clamps: Aluminum, CNC racing triple clamps
Consumption 2.1 Lts

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8600