Fuji Norcom Straight 2.1 vs Trinx X1 Pro

Compare Specifications of Fuji Norcom Straight 2.1 and Trinx X1 Pro

Selected Bikes

Fuji Norcom Straight 2.1
Fuji Norcom Straight 2.1

Brand:

Model:

Trinx X1 Pro
Trinx X1 Pro

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Frame C5 aero carbon tubing Trinx Alloy Tri-Butted Smooth Welding 29"x 15"/17"/19"
Stem Aero, forged 7050 stem body, aero faceplate cover, +/-17° Trinx Alloy
Handle Bar Wing base bar with extensions Trinx Alloy
Fork C5 carbon aero monocoque Magnesium AIR Remote Suspension,Travel :100 mm
Seatpost Aero carbon, multi-position Trinx Alloy
Crankset Shimano Ultegra, 53/39T --
Chain KMC X11EL KMC 9S
Shifters Shimano Dura-Ace bar-end TT shifters, 2 x 11-speed Shimano Altus M2010
Saddle Oval Concepts 534T, dual zone, steel rails Trinx Sport
Headset FSA, 1 1/8" press fit top, integrated bottom bearing --
Derailleur Front Shimano Ultegra Di2 Shimano Altus M370
Derailleur Rear Shimano Ultegra Di2 Shimano Altus M370
Hub Front -- Formula Alloy Double Sealed Bearing
Hub Rear -- Formula Alloy Double Sealed Bearing
Cassette Shimano Ultegra, 11-28T CS-M2009,11-32T
Chainrings -- Shimano FC-MT101
Bottom Bracket Shimano, press fit --
Tyres
Front Vittoria Rubino Pro IV, G2.0, 700 x 28, 120tpi, folding CST 29"x 2.10"27TPI
Rear Vittoria Rubino Pro IV, G2.0, 700 x 28, 120tpi, folding CST 29"x 2.10"27TPI
Wheel / RIM Vision TC55, carbon tubeless rims, 24/24H Rim:Alloy,Double Walls
Brakes
Front TRP, hydraulic disc, 140 mm rotors Shimano BR-MT200 Hydraulic Disc
Rear TRP, hydraulic disc, 140 mm rotors Shimano BR-MT200 Hydraulic Disc
Brake Lever TRP, hydraulic disc --
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Satin carbon Blue/White
Orange/Black White
Matte Black/Red White
Black/Blue White


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Overview
Features - C 10 High Modulous Carbon
- RIB technology
- Race Geometry
- Internal Cable Routing
--
Additional Details Tape : Oval Concepts 300, suede
Sizes : S (50.5cm), M (52.5cm), L (55cm), XL (57.5cm)
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9618