Fuji Transonic 1.1 vs KEYSTO KS680

Compare Specifications of Fuji Transonic 1.1 and KEYSTO KS680

Selected Bikes

Fuji Transonic 1.1
Fuji Transonic 1.1

Brand:

Model:

KEYSTO KS680
KEYSTO KS680

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Frame C15 ultra high-modulus carbon, high compaction molding, integrated and tapered head tube, PF30 BB, 142 x 12 mm thru-axle 26" Alloy Special-Shaped Tubes
Stem Oval Concepts 790 Aero, 3D-forged, -17°, integrated computer mount --
Handle Bar Oval Concepts 990 Aero carbon, 31.8 mm clamp, 125 mm drop / 75 mm reach --
Fork C15 carbon monocoque, tapered carbon steerer, 100 x 12 mm thru-axle 26" Steel Suspension Lock-Out Travel:100mm
Seatpost Oval Concepts Transonic Aero, 300 mm 46-52cm / 350 mm 54-61cm --
Crankset SRAM Force carbon, 48/35T --
Chain SRAM Force KMC
Shifters SRAM Force eTap AXSa, 2 x 12-speed KS80
Saddle Oval Concepts X38 with pressure relief zone, cromo rails --
Headset FSA, 1 1/4" upper - 1 1/2" lower, integrated --
Derailleur Front SRAM Force eTap AXS FD-QD-13
Derailleur Rear SRAM Force eTap AXS RD-HG-40A
Cassette SRAM Force XG-1270, 10-33T --
Bottom Bracket SRAM DUB, PF30 --
Tyres
Front Vittoria Corsa, G2.0, 700 x 28c, 320 tpi, folding 26" x 2.125"
Rear Vittoria Corsa, G2.0, 700 x 28c, 320 tpi, folding 26" x 2.125"
Wheel / RIM FSA Vision TC55 Disc, carbon tubeless rims, 24H Spoke
Brakes
Front SRAM Force eTap AXS hydraulic disc, 160 mm rotors Alloy Mechanical Disc
Rear SRAM Force eTap AXS hydraulic disc, 140 mm rotors Alloy Mechanical Disc
Brake Lever SRAM Force eTap AXS, hydraulic disc --
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Satin Carbon
Gloss Black
Black


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Overview
Features - Computational Fluid Dynamics Analysis
- C-10 High Modulus Carbon
- Thru - Axle
- Chain stay Protector
- Integrated chain watcher
--
Additional Details Sizes : XXS (46cm), XS (49cm), S (52cm), M (54cm), L (56cm), XL (58cm), XXL (61cm)
Tape : Anti-Slip Silicone
Wheel : 26" Alloy Double Wall
Chainwheel : 24/34/42T*170L

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

2344