GasGas ECRANGER 300 2019 vs Sherco 300 ST-R

Compare Specifications of GasGas ECRANGER 300 2019 and Sherco 300 ST-R

Selected Bikes

GasGas ECRANGER 300 2019
GasGas ECRANGER 300 2019

Brand:

Model:

Sherco 300 ST-R
Sherco 300 ST-R

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 299.30 cc 294.00 cc
Engine 2-stroke Single-cylinder, liquid-cooled 2 stroke Sherco proprietary design
Engine Starting Electric Geared system with folding lever
Engine Lubrication -- 2% oil pre-mix
Clutch Multidisc in oil bath. Magura clutch pump Hydraulic, diaphragm system
Fuel System Carburettor Keihin PWK 36 mm --
Ignition Electronic – Euro4 with 2-stage MAP switch Hidria digital
Cooling System Liquid Cooled Liquid Cooled
Transmission 6 speed 5 speed
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 1-N-2-3-4-5
Frame Center frame in chrome-moly-steel frame Tubular section Chrome-moly
Headlamp LED --
Taillamp LED --
Tyres
Front 21VRM211F T.T. Morad 21” black rim
Rear 18 VRM211F T.T. Morad 18” black rim
Wheel / RIM Spoke Spoke
Brakes
Front NG Disk 260 mm 185 mm Hydraulically activated, floating
Rear NG Disk 220 mm --
Suspension
Front -- 39 mm Steel Tech fork
Rear -- 175 mm Progressive link system with single adjustable shock absorber
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 2145 mm --
Width 810 mm --
Height 1205 mm --
Weight 107 kg --
Wheelbase 1480 mm 1322 mm
Ground Clearance -- 310 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 10 litres 2.4 litres
Overview
Features - New Gas Gas ECRanger motor design
- New torque focused ECRanger expansion chamber
- New thermodynamic and higher performance
- New crankshaft
- Cylinder with new distribution
- Cylinder head with new strut
- TECNIGAS 2.0 exhaust silencer designed exclusively for Gas Gas
- New refrigeration system
- Cylinder head: improved compression rate and dome-shaped head
- Crankshaft: new balancing, reduced vibration, more torque in the mid-range and at high revs
- New CDI curve: increased power at low rpms
- Removable rear exhaust bracket
- R16v shock absorber

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

367