GasGas XC 200 2019 vs Lifan LF200ZH-X

Compare Specifications of GasGas XC 200 2019 and Lifan LF200ZH-X

Selected Bikes

GasGas XC 200 2019
GasGas XC 200 2019

Brand:

Model:

Lifan LF200ZH-X
Lifan LF200ZH-X

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 199.40 cc 196.00 cc
Engine 2-stroke Single-cylinder, liquid-cooled 4-stroke, air-cooled
Engine Starting Electric and Kick start Electric/kick start
Clutch Multidisc in oil bath. Rekluse system. Magura clutch pump --
Fuel System Carburettor Keihin PWK 38 mm --
Ignition Electronic – Euro4 --
Cooling System Liquid Cooled --
Maximum Power -- 14 Ps @ 8000 Rpm
Maximum Torque -- 14.5 Nm @ 5000 Rpm
Transmission 6 speed 5 gears
Gear Shift Pattern 1-N-2-3-4-5-6 --
Top Speed -- 60 kmph
Frame Center frame in chrome-moly-steelframe --
Tyres
Front 21 M/C 54R Michelin Enduro Medium F TT 5.00-12
Rear 18 70R Michelin Enduro Medium R TT 5.00-12
Wheel / RIM Spoke --
Brakes
Front 260 mm NG disc, Nissin caliper Drum
Rear 220 mm NG disc, Nissin caliper Drum
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors -- --


Physical Specs
Length 2145 mm 3730 mm
Width 810 mm 1360 mm
Height 1235 mm 1420 mm
Weight 105 kg 430 kg
Wheelbase 1480 mm 2240 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 10 litres 15 litres
Overview
Features - Incorporation of new “Sun/Rain” double switch map.
- New optimized electric start system
- New electrical installation
- New system for mounting the display of the 28.6 mm diameter handlebar without central bar redesigned with a new steering position
- New Neken grips for firmer grip
- New GasGas brand central handlebar protector
- New redesigned handlebar supports to give greater rigidity to the handlebar mounting system
- New special graphic design for the 2019 EC / XC series
- New MY2019 graphic
- GasGas red frame protectors
- Re-designed side number panels and rear mudguard for a better fit of the parts, easier maintenance and filter cleaning
--
Additional Details -- Three-Wheeler Model : LF200ZH-X
Rear Track (mm) : 1140
Carriage Dimension (mm) : 2000×1300×480
Fuel Consumption (L/100km) ≤ 4.3

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8833