Genuine G400C vs Kawasaki Ninja 400 Performance

Compare Specifications of Genuine G400C and Kawasaki Ninja 400 Performance

Selected Bikes

Genuine G400C
Genuine G400C

Brand:

Model:

Kawasaki Ninja 400 Performance
Kawasaki Ninja 400 Performance

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Petrol Petrol
Engine Displacement 397.00 cc 399.00 cc
Engine Valves : 4 per Cylinder Liquid-cooled, 4-stroke Parallel Twin,DOHC, 8 valves
Engine Starting -- Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Forced lubrication, wet sump
Clutch -- Wet multi-disc, manual
Fuel System -- Fuel injection: Ø 32 mm x 2
Cooling System -- Liquid-cooled
Maximum Power 26 HP 45 PS @ 10000 RPM
Maximum Torque 29.83 NM 38 NM @ 8000 RPM
Transmission -- 6-speed
Gear Shift Pattern -- 1-N-2-3-4-5-6
Top Speed 128 kmph --
Frame -- Trellis, high-tensile steel
Fuel Economy
Overall Mileage 29.76 kmpl --
Tyres
Front -- 110/70R17 M/C 54H
Rear -- 150/60R17 M/C 66H
Wheel / RIM 19" / 18" Spoke Wheels Alloy
Brakes
Front -- Single semi-floating 310 mm petal discs. Caliper: Single balanced actuation dual piston
Rear -- Single 220 mm petal disc. Caliper: Dual-piston
Suspension
Front -- 41mm telescopic fork
Rear -- Bottom-Link Uni-Trak, gas-charged shock with adjustable preload
Colors Available
Colors Black
Green
Red
Lime green / Ebony (KRT Edition)
Metallic Spark Black / Lime Green


Physical Specs
Length 2108 mm 1990 mm
Width -- 710 mm
Height 1117 mm 1120 mm
Weight 160 kg --
Kerb Weight -- 168
Seat Height 787 785
Wheelbase -- 1370 mm
Ground Clearance -- 140 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 12.8 litres 14 litres
Overview
Features -- - Akrapovic Sports Exhaust
Additional Details -- Final drive : Sealed chain
Primary Reduction Ratio : 2.219 (71/32)
Gear Ratios 1st : 2.929 (41/14)
Gear Ratios 2nd : 2.056 (37/18)
Gear Ratios 3rd : 1.619 (34/21)
Gear Ratios 4th : 1.333 (32/24)
Gear Ratios 5th : 1.154 (30/26)
Gear Ratios 6th : 1.037 (28/27)
Final reduction ratio : 2.929 (41/14)
CO2 emission : 100 g/km
Trail : 92 mm
Wheel travel front : 120 mm
Wheel travel rear : 130 mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

8950