Gesits Electric Scooter vs Yamaha Tricity 125 2022

Compare Specifications of Gesits Electric Scooter and Yamaha Tricity 125 2022

Selected Bikes

Gesits Electric Scooter
Gesits Electric Scooter

Brand:

Model:

Yamaha Tricity 125 2022
Yamaha Tricity 125 2022

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Engine Displacement -- 125.00 cc
Engine Permanent Magnet Synchronous Motor 4-stroke;Liquid-cooled;SOHC;Single cylinder;4-valves;EURO5
Engine Starting -- Electric
Engine Lubrication -- Wet sump
Fuel System -- Fuel Injection
Ignition -- TCI
Cooling System Air Cooled --
Maximum Power 6.7 hp @ 3600 rpm 12 PS @ @ 8000 RPM
Maximum Torque 30 Nm @ 2125 rpm 11.2 Nm @ 6000 RPM
Transmission Gates Poly Chain V-Belt Automatic
Top Speed 70 kmph --
Display -- LCD Display
Headlamp LED LED
Taillamp LED LED
Tyres
Front 80/80 - R14 90/80-14M/C 43P Tubeless
Rear 100/80 - R14 130/70-13M/C 63P Tubeless
Wheel / RIM Alloy Alloy
Brakes
Front Double Disc Brake Two Hydraulic disc brakes
Rear Double Disc Brake Hydraulic single disc brake
Suspension
Front Telescopic Front suspension system : Telescopic forks
Front travel : 90 mm
Rear Aluminium Multi-Link Rear suspension system Unit Swing
Rear travel : 90 mm
Colors Available
Colors -- Sand Grey
Petrol Blue
Matt Grey


Physical Specs
Length 1947 mm 1995 mm
Width 674 mm 750 mm
Height 1135 mm 1215 mm
Weight 94.5 kg 168 kg
Seat Height -- 785
Wheelbase 1290 mm 1410 mm
Ground Clearance -- 125 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity -- 7.2 litres
Overview
Features - Detection and Protection System Failure
- Max Riding Range Per Battery : Approx.50 km for single battery and approx.100 km for dual battery
- New EURO5 Blue Core 125cc engine
- Optimised three-wheel layout
- New chassis for increased comfort
- Start & Stop engine technology
- Newly developed twin shock rear suspension
- Front and rear disc brakes with optimised UBS
- New LCD instruments with smartphone connectivity
- New Smart Key keyless operation
- Larger footboard area
- LED headlight with broader beam
- Underseat storage and front pocket
Additional Details -- Fuel consumption : 2.3 L/100 km
CO2 emission : 54 g/km

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

6555