Giant Escape 2 Disc vs Montague Allston

Compare Specifications of Giant Escape 2 Disc and Montague Allston

Selected Bikes

Giant Escape 2 Disc
Giant Escape 2 Disc

Brand:

Model:

Montague Allston
Montague Allston

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Frame ALUXX-Grade Aluminum, disc 6061 series aluminum with DirectConnect System. Seatstay splitter for belt drive and eccentric bottom bracket
Stem Giant Sport, 15-degree, 31.8 Kalloy, Alloy direct connect. 15 degree rise
Handle Bar Giant Sport XC , 31.8 Riser style 20mm rise. 580mm wide. Alloy
Fork alloy, rack mount, disc Full Cro-Mo, with disc mount and ramped dropout.
Seats -- Full Cro-Mo, with disc mount and ramped dropout
Seatpost Giant D-Fuse, alloy 30.0 X 300mm Alloy with Montague logo
Crankset forged alloy, 30/46 Gates 46T for belt drive. 170mm crank arm
Pedals Giant Urban Fitness Platform trekking pedal. Aluminum Cage
Chain KMC Z8.3 --
Shifters Shimano Altus Shimano Alfine Rapid Fire trigger shifters
Saddle Giant Sport Comfort --
Derailleur Front Shimano FD-TY710 --
Derailleur Rear Shimano Altus Shimano Alfine 11-speed internal gear hub.
Hub Front alloy, 32h,loose ball bearing --
Hub Rear alloy, 32h,loose ball bearing --
Spoke stainless, 14 g --
Cassette Shimano CS-HG31, 11 x 34 --
Sprocket -- Gates belt drive CDX sprocket. 24T
Tyres
Front Giant S-X2, Puncture Protect, 700 x 38 Vee Rubber trekking tire. 700c x 38mm
Rear Giant S-X2, Puncture Protect, 700 x 38 Vee Rubber trekking tire. 700c x 38mm
Wheel / RIM Giant GX Disc Spoke
Brakes
Front Tektro HD-R280 --
Rear Tektro HD-R280 Shimano Deore hydraulic disc brake
Brake Lever Tektro Shimano Deore hydraulic disc brake
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Gunmetal Black Gloss Black/Red


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 13.6 kg
Overview
Features - Balanced and efficient
- Versatile and capable
- Rugged reliability
--
Additional Details Bottom Bracket : cartridge Bottom Bracke : Sealed Cartridge
Folded Size : 914 x 711 x 304 mm

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

9516