Giant XTC JR 20 Lite 2020 vs Rondo Mutt AL

Compare Specifications of Giant XTC JR 20 Lite 2020 and Rondo Mutt AL

Selected Bikes

Giant XTC JR 20 Lite 2020
Giant XTC JR 20 Lite 2020

Brand:

Model:

Rondo Mutt AL
Rondo Mutt AL

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Frame ALUXX-Grade Aluminum RUUT CUSTOM FORMED AL6061-T6
Stem Steel, quill RONDO 80 MM(S), 90 MM(M), 110 MM(L), 110 MM(XL)
Handle Bar Giant Jr MTB, 25.4 Rondo Road 400 MM(S), 420 MM(M,L), 440 MM(XL)
Fork High Tensile Steel Rigid Fork, 1-1/8" TWINTIP CARBON
Seatpost 27,2 RONDO 350 X 27.2
Grip -- VELO COMFORT TAPE
Crankset 32t, 127 mm FSA OMEGA COMPACT 48/32T
Pedals Platform --
Chain KMC HV500 Shimano HG500
Shifters Shimano Revo Shifter Shimano Tiagra ST4720
Saddle Giant Grow Technology FABRIC SCOOP FLAT
Headset -- UPPER STACK: IS 42 / 28,6 LOWER STACK: IS 52 / 40 SHIS
Derailleur Front -- Shimano 105 FD-R7000
Derailleur Rear Shimano Tourney Shimano Tiagra RD4700
Hub Front Nutted, 28h RONDO SUPERLIGHT SEALED BEARINGS
Hub Rear Nutted, 28h RONDO SUPERLIGHT SEALED BEARINGS
Spoke Stainless, 14 g --
Cassette 14 x 28 Shimano KSCHG500 11-32T 10 SPEED
Bottom Bracket -- PF86
Tyres
Front Giant Junior Lite, 20 x 1.95 WTB 650B X 47 BYWAY FRONT/HORIZON REAR
Rear Giant Junior Lite, 20 x 1.95 WTB 650B X 47 BYWAY FRONT/HORIZON REAR
Wheel / RIM Giant Kids 20", Alloy RONDO Alu 584-23 TUBELESS COMPATIBLE
Brakes
Front Alloy, linear pull SHIMANO BR4770 HYDRAULIC BRAKES
Rear Alloy, linear pull SHIMANO BR4770 HYDRAULIC BRAKES
Brake Lever Alloy, junior MTB --
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Vibrant Blue
Lemon Yellow
--


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 11.1 kg
Overview
About 5 - 9 Years Read More --
Features - Lightweight frame
- Confidence and control
- Kid-friendly features
--
Additional Details Bottom Bracket : Semi-cartridge
Extras : Bell, kickstand
Frame sizes : XS, S, M, L, XL
Axle front : 100/12mm/thread 1.5
Axle rear : 142/12mm/thread 1.75
Fenders : Front fender in LO possition only

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1472