Gitane e-Verso E-Going Equipped vs YADEA YT500

Compare Specifications of Gitane e-Verso E-Going Equipped and YADEA YT500

Selected Bikes

Gitane e-Verso E-Going Equipped
Gitane e-Verso E-Going Equipped

Brand:

Model:

YADEA YT500
YADEA YT500

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Brand:

Model:

Technical Specifications
Fuel Electric Electric
Motor E-Going, rear wheel motor, 36V, 48Nm Fusion Mid-Motor
Range Up to 60 km 2-6 in Single Charge
Maximum Torque 48 NM --
Battery E-Going DT-12, semi-integrated, 400 Wh 36V 13AH LG Cell
Display E-Going, LCD on the left LCD Display
Frame Aluminum 6061-T6, 28 ", Men's Trekking, disc Aluminium Alloy 6061
Stem TEC Obvius, aluminum, 27.2 x 350 mm 3D Forged AL6061
Fork Suntour NEX 700, 63 mm SR-Suntour Nex-E25-Coil-27.5"
Crankset Shimano Tourney, 48 x 38 x 28 teeth, 170 mm Lasco 40T x 170L
Shifters -- Shimano SL-M2010 9S
Saddle TEC Fero, black Selleroyal Essenza
Derailleur Front Shimano Altus, FD-T3000
Derailleur levers : Shimano Altus, SL-M370, 27V
Shimano Altus RDM370 9S
Derailleur Rear Shimano Acera, RD-T3000-SGS --
Hub Front E-Going Motor, 36T Kunteng Aluminium Disc Hub-M9
Hub Rear Aluminum Kunteng Aluminium Disc Hub-M10
Cassette Shimano CS-HG300-9, 11-32 --
Headlamp -- 12V-LED
Tyres
Front Spectra Pergo, 700 x 38C, 60 tpi, Duramax X3 Kendra 27.5 x 1.95 Bk
Rear Spectra Pergo, 700 x 38C, 60 tpi, Duramax X3 Kendra 27.5 x 1.95 Bk
Wheel / RIM Rims : Mach1 560, aluminum, double wall, 28 " Spoke
Brakes
Front Tektro Auriga M285, hydraulic, 180/160 mm Shimano BR-MT200
Rear Tektro Auriga M285, hydraulic, 180/160 mm Shimano BR-MT200
Brake Lever -- Shimano BL-MT200
Suspension
Front -- --
Rear -- --
Colors Available
Colors Black --


Physical Specs
Length -- --
Weight -- 26 kg
Overview
Features -- --
Additional Details Hanger : TEC Obvius, 630 x 31.8 x 15 x 9 °
Gallows : TEC Obvius, aluminum, 90 x 31.8 x 7 °
Sizes available : 47 51 55
Free Wheel : Shimano CS-HG200-9S
Accessories Mudguards : SKS, black
Luggage rack : Atran Tour 365, aluminum, with AVS system
Crutch : Atran Dux, adjustable, rear attachment
--

Which one do you think is better? And why?
Name :

Comment :

1395